BYD Shark 6 vs Mazda CX-6e
Two electric cars go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The BYD Shark 6 starts from $55,900 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-6e opens at $59,106. That makes the BYD Shark 6 the more affordable entry point by $3,206.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $61,490 and $65,017 respectively.
Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.
Safety Rundown
Both the BYD Shark 6 and Mazda CX-6e hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-6e packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the BYD Shark 6.
Both include the essentials: core safety systems.
Feature Showdown
The BYD Shark 6 features a 12.8-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-6e gets a 26.5-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The BYD Shark 6 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Mazda CX-6e. The Mazda CX-6e counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, ventilated seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The BYD Shark 6 uses a Hybrid producing 321kW and 650Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout.
The Mazda CX-6e responds with a Electric making 190kW and 290Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels.
The BYD Shark 6 has the clear power advantage at 321kW vs 190kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Battery: 29.6kWh (BYD Shark 6) vs 77.9kWh (Mazda CX-6e), giving WLTP ranges of 100km and 484km.
Space & Comfort
The BYD Shark 6 measures 5,457mm long on a 3,260mm wheelbase, 607mm longer than the Mazda CX-6e at 4,850mm (2,902mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BYD Shark 6 generally means more rear legroom.
0For towing, the BYD Shark 6 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Shark 6) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-6e). The BYD Shark 6 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the BYD Shark 6 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-6e if: You or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The BYD Shark 6 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The BYD Shark 6 adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
