Toyota Tundra vs Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Toyota Tundra
From $155,990
Ute
Petrol
326kW
11.4 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
—
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance
From $189,900
Sedan
Hybrid
500kW
6.9 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
359L
Price Breakdown
The Toyota Tundra starts from $155,990 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance opens at $189,900. That makes the Toyota Tundra the more affordable entry point by $33,910.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $171,589 and $208,890 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance by roughly $6,410 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Toyota Tundra and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. The Toyota Tundra adds a 360-degree camera that the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance misses.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Toyota Tundra stands out with wireless charging and JBL audio that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance counters with head-up display, panoramic roof and Burmester audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Toyota Tundra uses a Petrol producing 326kW and 790Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.3 seconds.
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance responds with a Hybrid making 500kW and 1020Nm, paired to a 9-speed auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 3.4 seconds.
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has the clear power advantage at 500kW vs 326kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is 3.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Toyota Tundra measures 5,955mm long on a 3,700mm wheelbase, 1113mm longer than the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance at 4,842mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Tundra generally means more rear legroom.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
14.6m diameter
Large
Based on 14.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,249/year for the Toyota Tundra and $1,967/year for the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance. That is a $1,282 annual difference in favour of the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance.
Estimated annual total: $3,249 (Toyota Tundra) vs $1,967 (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance). The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance saves you roughly $1,282 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Tundra) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Toyota Tundra if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance will save you roughly $1,282 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
