BYD Atto 3 vs MG ZS EV
Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The BYD Atto 3 starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the MG ZS EV opens at $43,990. That makes the BYD Atto 3 the more affordable entry point by $4,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $48,389 respectively.
Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The BYD Atto 3 stands out with Dirac audio that you will not find on the MG ZS EV. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The BYD Atto 3 uses a Electric producing 150kW and 310Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.3 seconds.
The MG ZS EV responds with a Electric Motor making 115kW and 280Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.2 seconds.
The BYD Atto 3 has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 115kW. In the real-world sprint, the BYD Atto 3 is 0.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Battery: 49.9kWh (BYD Atto 3) vs 72.6kWh (MG ZS EV), giving WLTP ranges of 345km and 440km. DC fast charging peaks at 80kW (BYD Atto 3) vs 92kW (MG ZS EV).
Space & Comfort
The BYD Atto 3 measures 4,455mm long on a 2,720mm wheelbase, 132mm longer than the MG ZS EV at 4,323mm (2,585mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BYD Atto 3 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 440L in the BYD Atto 3 and 359L in the MG ZS EV, giving the BYD Atto 3 a 81L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m diameter
Good
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Atto 3) vs 10 years / 999,999km (MG ZS EV). The MG ZS EV has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the BYD Atto 3 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the MG ZS EV if: You value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The MG ZS EV takes 5 of 9 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the BYD Atto 3 has a clear edge. The MG ZS EV adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
