CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›NIO Firefly vs Volvo ES90
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

NIO Firefly vs Volvo ES90

Two electric Sedans go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 28 Aug 2026, price 25 Jun 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
NIO FireflyLaunch5?07
Volvo ES90Plus Single Motor8?04

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

Specifications in progress

NIO Firefly: not on sale yet, so NIO hasn't published price and energy consumption.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecNIOVolvo
Price (RRP)TBC$88,880
Fuel typeElectricElectric
Range (WLTP)330km554km
Battery41.2 kWh92 kWh
Power105kW245kW
0-100 km/h8.1s6.6s
Max DC Charge100kW300kW
10-80% Charge Time35 min22 min
Boot (seats up)404L424L
Towing—1,600kg
Warranty7yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data
V2LYesNo

Track the NIO Firefly & Volvo ES90

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

NIO Firefly

None open on our record

Volvo ES90

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

44.9kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

43 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 100kW · 0–80%

27 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC, 100kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

107kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 43m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 300kW · 0–80%

21 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 300kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The NIO Firefly features a 13.2-inch touchscreen paired with a 6-inch digital dash, while the Volvo ES90 gets a 14.5-inch display and 9-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The NIO Firefly stands out with Apple CarPlay and V2L — features our data doesn't list for the Volvo ES90. The Volvo ES90 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The NIO Firefly uses a Single electric motor producing 105kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.1 seconds.

The Volvo ES90 responds with a Electric making 245kW and 480Nm, paired to a single-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.6 seconds.

The Volvo ES90 has the clear power advantage at 245kW vs 105kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Volvo ES90 is 1.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 41.2kWh (NIO Firefly) vs 92kWh (Volvo ES90), giving WLTP ranges of 330km and 554km. DC fast charging peaks at 100kW (NIO Firefly) vs 300kW (Volvo ES90).

Space & Comfort

The NIO Firefly measures 4,003mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 997mm shorter than the Volvo ES90 at 5,000mm (3,102mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volvo ES90 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 404L in the NIO Firefly and 424L in the Volvo ES90, giving the Volvo ES90 a 20L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.4m to 12.0m

TightestNIO Firefly LaunchTightest turn at 9.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
NIO Firefly Launch
9.4mTighter
Best
Volvo ES90 Plus Single Motor
12.0m
Worst
NIO Firefly Launch
9.4m · Excellent

Based on 9.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volvo ES90 Plus Single Motor
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestNIO FireflyTightest turn at 9.4m, needs the least road to swing around
NIO FireflyTightest9.4 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Volvo ES9012.0 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 150,000km (NIO Firefly) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo ES90). The NIO Firefly has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the NIO Firefly if: You value a longer warranty, or prefer NIO's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo ES90 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Volvo ES90: Top CarSorted Score, 66 vs 54

The Volvo ES90 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (66 vs 54), taking 8 of 10 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: technology (Volvo ES90 ahead by 47), safety (Volvo ES90 ahead by 29), performance (Volvo ES90 ahead by 28). The NIO Firefly adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, NIO Firefly and Volvo ES90?

The Volvo ES90 is the cheapest at $88,880 before on-road costs.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Volvo ES90 has the most range at 554km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Volvo ES90 accepts the highest DC charging at up to 300kW.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of NIO Firefly and Volvo ES90 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volvo ES90 has the largest boot at 424L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The Volvo ES90 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,600kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The NIO Firefly has the longest warranty at 7 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo ES90 makes the most power at 245kW. The Volvo ES90 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.6s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best electric cars