CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsPeugeot 2008 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Peugeot 2008 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecPeugeotMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$42,490$43,490
Range (WLTP)55km
Battery13.8 kWh
Power100kW96kW
0-100 km/h8.3s9.7s
Max DC Charge50kW
10-80% Charge Time38 min
Fuel Economy5.7 L/100km1.6 L/100km
Boot Space434L409L
Towing1,100kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 200k km10yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Peugeot 2008 starts from $42,490 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV opens at $43,490. That makes the Peugeot 2008 the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $46,739 and $47,839 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV by roughly $5,845 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Peugeot 2008 and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 93% for the Peugeot 2008 and 97% for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Peugeot 2008 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Peugeot 2008 and 7 in the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV.

Feature Showdown

The Peugeot 2008 features a 10-inch touchscreen, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Peugeot 2008 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and Focal audio that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Peugeot 2008 uses a Hybrid producing 100kW and 230Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.3 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV responds with a Petrol making 96kW and 195Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.7 seconds.

The Peugeot 2008 has the clear power advantage at 100kW vs 96kW. In the real-world sprint, the Peugeot 2008 is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Peugeot 2008 measures 4,300mm long on a 2,605mm wheelbase, 245mm shorter than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV at 4,545mm (2,670mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 434L in the Peugeot 2008 and 409L in the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV, giving the Peugeot 2008 a 25L advantage.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,100kg. That 400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 10.8m

Peugeot 2008 Allure Hybrid
10.6mTighter
Best
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ES
10.8m
Worst
Peugeot 2008
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,625/year for the Peugeot 2008 and $456/year for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV. That is a $1,169 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV.

Estimated annual total: $1,625 (Peugeot 2008) vs $456 (Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV). The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV saves you roughly $1,169 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 200,000km (Peugeot 2008) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV). The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Peugeot 2008 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Peugeot 2008 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV will save you roughly $1,169 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs