CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSubaru Crosstrek vs Suzuki e Vitara
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Subaru Crosstrek vs Suzuki e Vitara

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSubaruSuzuki
Price (RRP)$36,490$36,990
Range (WLTP)344km
Battery49 kWh
Power115kW128kW
0-100 km/h10.9s9s
Max DC Charge129kW
10-80% Charge Time17 min
Fuel Economy7.7 L/100km15 kWh/100km
Boot Space559L306L
Towing1,200kg750kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Subaru Crosstrek starts from $36,490 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki e Vitara opens at $36,990. That makes the Subaru Crosstrek the more affordable entry point by $500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $40,139 and $40,689 respectively.

The Suzuki e Vitara qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Subaru Crosstrek, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki e Vitara by roughly $7,375 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Subaru Crosstrek and Suzuki e Vitara hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 83% for the Subaru Crosstrek and 77% for the Suzuki e Vitara.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Subaru Crosstrek packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Suzuki e Vitara.

Both include the essentials: a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Subaru Crosstrek stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Suzuki e Vitara. The Suzuki e Vitara counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Subaru Crosstrek uses a Petrol producing 115kW and 196Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The Suzuki e Vitara responds with a Electric Motor making 128kW and 189Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9 seconds.

The Suzuki e Vitara has the clear power advantage at 128kW vs 115kW. In the real-world sprint, the Suzuki e Vitara is 1.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Subaru Crosstrek measures 4,495mm long on a 2,670mm wheelbase, 220mm longer than the Suzuki e Vitara at 4,275mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Suzuki e Vitara generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 559L in the Subaru Crosstrek and 306L in the Suzuki e Vitara, giving the Subaru Crosstrek a 253L advantage.

For towing, the Subaru Crosstrek leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 450kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 10.8m

Suzuki e Vitara Motion FWD
10.4mTighter
Best
Subaru Crosstrek AWD 2.0L
10.8m
Worst
Subaru Crosstrek
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki e Vitara
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,195/year for the Subaru Crosstrek and $720/year for the Suzuki e Vitara. That is a $1,475 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki e Vitara.

Estimated annual total: $2,195 (Subaru Crosstrek) vs $720 (Suzuki e Vitara). The Suzuki e Vitara saves you roughly $1,475 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru Crosstrek) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Suzuki e Vitara). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Subaru Crosstrek if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki e Vitara if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Subaru Crosstrek takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki e Vitara will save you roughly $1,475 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Subaru Crosstrek has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Subaru Crosstrek and Suzuki e Vitara?

The Subaru Crosstrek is the cheapest at $36,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki e Vitara by $500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Subaru Crosstrek uses the least fuel at 7.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Subaru Crosstrek and Suzuki e Vitara all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Subaru Crosstrek has the largest boot at 559L.

Which can tow the most?

The Subaru Crosstrek has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Suzuki e Vitara makes the most power at 128kW. The Suzuki e Vitara is quickest to 100km/h in 9s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs