CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-5 vs CUPRA Formentor
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-5 vs CUPRA Formentor

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaCUPRA
Price (RRP)$39,990$54,990
Power140kW140kW
0-100 km/h8.7s7s
Fuel Economy7.3 L/100km7 L/100km
Boot Space438L420L
Towing1,800kg1,700kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-5 starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the CUPRA Formentor opens at $54,990. That makes the Mazda CX-5 the more affordable entry point by $15,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $60,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-5 and CUPRA Formentor hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 95% for the Mazda CX-5 and 93% for the CUPRA Formentor.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The CUPRA Formentor packs more ADAS features with 8 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Mazda CX-5.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-5 and 7 in the CUPRA Formentor.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-5 features a 12.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the CUPRA Formentor gets a 12.9-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-5 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the CUPRA Formentor. The CUPRA Formentor counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, heated front seats, power tailgate and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-5 uses a Petrol producing 140kW and 252Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.7 seconds.

The CUPRA Formentor responds with a 4-cyl Turbo Petrol making 140kW and 320Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7 seconds.

Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the real-world sprint, the CUPRA Formentor is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-5 measures 4,575mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 125mm longer than the CUPRA Formentor at 4,450mm (2,680mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-5 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 438L in the Mazda CX-5 and 420L in the CUPRA Formentor, giving the Mazda CX-5 a 18L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-5 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,700kg. That 100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.7m to 11.0m

CUPRA Formentor V
10.7mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD
11.0m
Worst
Mazda CX-5
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
CUPRA Formentor
10.7m · Good

Based on 10.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,081/year for the Mazda CX-5 and $1,995/year for the CUPRA Formentor. That is a $86 annual difference in favour of the CUPRA Formentor.

Estimated annual total: $2,081 (Mazda CX-5) vs $1,995 (CUPRA Formentor). The CUPRA Formentor saves you roughly $86 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-5) vs 5 years / 999,999km (CUPRA Formentor). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-5 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the CUPRA Formentor if: You want lower running costs, or prefer CUPRA's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-5 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The CUPRA Formentor will save you roughly $86 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-5 and CUPRA Formentor?

The Mazda CX-5 is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the CUPRA Formentor by $15,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The CUPRA Formentor uses the least fuel at 7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-5 and CUPRA Formentor all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-5 has the largest boot at 438L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs