CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsNissan Navara vs Ford Ranger
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan Navara vs Ford Ranger

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecNissanFord
Price (RRP)$42,990$37,130
Power140kW125kW
0-100 km/h11.9s10.5s
Fuel Economy7.6 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Nissan Navara starts from $42,990 before on-road costs, while the Ford Ranger opens at $37,130. That makes the Ford Ranger the more affordable entry point by $5,860.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $47,289 and $40,843 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Nissan Navara and Ford Ranger hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Nissan Navara and 84% for the Ford Ranger.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Nissan Navara and 9 in the Ford Ranger.

Feature Showdown

The Nissan Navara features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Ford Ranger gets a 10.1-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Nissan Navara stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Ford Ranger. The Ford Ranger counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Nissan Navara uses a Diesel producing 140kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.9 seconds.

The Ford Ranger responds with a Diesel Turbo making 125kW and 405Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.

The Nissan Navara has the clear power advantage at 140kW vs 125kW. In the real-world sprint, the Ford Ranger is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Nissan Navara measures 5,260mm long on a 3,150mm wheelbase, 35mm longer than the Ford Ranger at 5,225mm (3,270mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Ranger generally means more rear legroom.

0

For towing, the Ford Ranger leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.4m to 12.9m

Nissan Navara SL 4x2
12.4mTighter
Best
Ford Ranger XL 4x2 Hi-Rider Single Cab Cab-Chassis
12.9m
Worst
Nissan Navara
12.4m · Large

Based on 12.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford Ranger
12.9m · Large

Based on 12.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,166/year for the Nissan Navara and $1,967/year for the Ford Ranger. That is a $199 annual difference in favour of the Ford Ranger.

Estimated annual total: $2,166 (Nissan Navara) vs $1,967 (Ford Ranger). The Ford Ranger saves you roughly $199 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan Navara) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Ranger). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan Navara if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Ranger if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Ranger takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Ford Ranger will save you roughly $199 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan Navara and Ford Ranger?

The Ford Ranger is the cheapest at $37,130 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Nissan Navara by $5,860.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ford Ranger uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Nissan Navara and Ford Ranger all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Nissan Navara has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan Navara makes the most power at 140kW. The Ford Ranger is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · All Cab Chassiss