CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAbarth 695 vs Peugeot 308
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Abarth 695 vs Peugeot 308

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAbarthPeugeot
Price (RRP)$48,369$48,990
Power132kW100kW
0-100 km/h6.7s9s
Fuel Economy6 L/100km4.2 L/100km
Boot Space185L384L
Towing1,150kg
Warranty3yr / 150k km5yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Abarth 695 starts from $48,369 before on-road costs, while the Peugeot 308 opens at $48,990. That makes the Abarth 695 the more affordable entry point by $621.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $53,206 and $53,889 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Peugeot 308 by roughly $2,565 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Abarth 695 and Peugeot 308 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Peugeot 308 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 2 in the Abarth 695.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Abarth 695 and 6 in the Peugeot 308.

Feature Showdown

The Abarth 695 features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Peugeot 308 gets a 10-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Abarth 695 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Peugeot 308. The Peugeot 308 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Abarth 695 uses a Turbo T-Jet producing 132kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.

The Peugeot 308 responds with a Hybrid making 100kW and 230Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9 seconds.

The Abarth 695 has the clear power advantage at 132kW vs 100kW. In the real-world sprint, the Abarth 695 is 2.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Abarth 695 measures 3,657mm long on a 2,300mm wheelbase, 708mm shorter than the Peugeot 308 at 4,365mm (2,675mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Peugeot 308 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 185L in the Abarth 695 and 384L in the Peugeot 308, giving the Peugeot 308 a 199L advantage. The Peugeot 308 seats 5 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 10.6m

Abarth 695 Competizione
9.3mTighter
Best
Peugeot 308 GT Hybrid
10.6m
Worst
Abarth 695
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Peugeot 308
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Abarth 695 and $1,197/year for the Peugeot 308. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot 308.

Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Abarth 695) vs $1,197 (Peugeot 308). The Peugeot 308 saves you roughly $513 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Abarth 695) vs 5 years / 200,000km (Peugeot 308). The Peugeot 308 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Abarth 695 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Peugeot 308 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Peugeot 308 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Peugeot 308 will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Peugeot 308 has a clear edge. The Peugeot 308 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Abarth 695 and Peugeot 308?

The Abarth 695 is the cheapest at $48,369 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Peugeot 308 by $621.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Peugeot 308 uses the least fuel at 4.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Abarth 695 and Peugeot 308 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Peugeot 308 has the largest boot at 384L.

Which can tow the most?

The Peugeot 308 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,150kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Peugeot 308 has the longest warranty at 5 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Abarth 695 makes the most power at 132kW. The Abarth 695 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.7s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks