CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›BMW 8 Series vs Volkswagen Passat CC
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW 8 Series vs Volkswagen Passat CC

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Volkswagen Passat CC: we're still completing price, kerb weight, warranty and ground clearance.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecBMWVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$294,900TBC
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power390kW220kW
0-100 km/h3.9s5.6s
Fuel Economy10.7 L/100km9.7 L/100km
Boot Space440L532L
Towing—1,600kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited—
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the BMW 8 Series & Volkswagen Passat CC

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The BMW 8 Series stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate and Bowers & Wilkins audio — features our data doesn't list for the Volkswagen Passat CC. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The BMW 8 Series uses a Petrol producing 390kW and 750Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.9 seconds.

The Volkswagen Passat CC responds with a 3.6-litre V6 FSI direct-injection petrol making 220kW and 350Nm, paired to a 6-speed dsg dual-clutch automatic, 4motion all-wheel drive driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.6 seconds.

The BMW 8 Series has the clear power advantage at 390kW vs 220kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the BMW 8 Series is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BMW 8 Series measures 5,082mm long on a 3,023mm wheelbase, 283mm longer than the Volkswagen Passat CC at 4,799mm (2,711mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW 8 Series generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 440L in the BMW 8 Series and 532L in the Volkswagen Passat CC, giving the Volkswagen Passat CC a 92L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 12.6m

TightestVolkswagen Passat CC Passat CC V6 FSITightest turn at 11.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volkswagen Passat CC Passat CC V6 FSI
11.4mTighter
Best
BMW 8 Series M850i xDrive Gran Coupe
12.6m
Worst
BMW 8 Series M850i xDrive Gran Coupe
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen Passat CC V6 FSI
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolkswagen Passat CCTightest turn at 11.4m, needs the least road to swing around
BMW 8 Series12.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Volkswagen Passat CCTightest11.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,050/year for the BMW 8 Series and $2,765/year for the Volkswagen Passat CC. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen Passat CC.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW 8 Series if: You prioritise performance, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen Passat CC if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volkswagen Passat CC takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Volkswagen Passat CC will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volkswagen Passat CC has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW 8 Series and Volkswagen Passat CC?

The BMW 8 Series is the cheapest at $294,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen Passat CC uses the least fuel at 9.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of BMW 8 Series and Volkswagen Passat CC carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volkswagen Passat CC has the largest boot at 532L.

Which can tow the most?

The Volkswagen Passat CC has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,600kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The BMW 8 Series makes the most power at 390kW. The BMW 8 Series is quickest to 100km/h in 3.9s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Gran Coupes · All Coupes · Best family cars