CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›BMW M4 vs Volkswagen Scirocco
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW M4 vs Volkswagen Scirocco

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Coupes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Volkswagen Scirocco: we're still completing price, kerb weight, ground clearance and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecBMWVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$168,700TBC
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power353kW188kW
0-100 km/h4.2s6.2s
Fuel Economy10.1 L/100km8.1 L/100km
Boot Space440L312L
Towing1,800kg—
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the BMW M4 & Volkswagen Scirocco

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The BMW M4 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen Scirocco gets a 6.5-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BMW M4 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, heated front seats, ventilated seats, Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Volkswagen Scirocco. The Volkswagen Scirocco counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The BMW M4 uses a Petrol producing 353kW and 550Nm of torque, sent through a manual to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.2 seconds.

The Volkswagen Scirocco responds with a 4 cylinder inline turbo direct injection petrol making 188kW and 330Nm, paired to a 6 speed manual driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.2 seconds.

The BMW M4 has the clear power advantage at 353kW vs 188kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the BMW M4 is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BMW M4 measures 4,801mm long on a 2,857mm wheelbase, 553mm longer than the Volkswagen Scirocco at 4,248mm (2,578mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW M4 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 440L in the BMW M4 and 312L in the Volkswagen Scirocco, giving the BMW M4 a 128L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.4m

TightestVolkswagen Scirocco Scirocco RTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volkswagen Scirocco Scirocco R
11.0mTighter
Best
BMW M4 Coupe Manual
11.4m
Worst
BMW M4 Coupe Manual
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen Scirocco R
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolkswagen SciroccoTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
BMW M411.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Volkswagen SciroccoTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,879/year for the BMW M4 and $2,309/year for the Volkswagen Scirocco. That is a $570 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen Scirocco.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW M4) vs 3 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen Scirocco). The BMW M4 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW M4 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen Scirocco if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The BMW M4 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The Volkswagen Scirocco will save you roughly $570 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BMW M4 has a clear edge. The BMW M4 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW M4 and Volkswagen Scirocco?

The BMW M4 is the cheapest at $168,700 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen Scirocco uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of BMW M4 and Volkswagen Scirocco carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The BMW M4 has the largest boot at 440L.

Which can tow the most?

The BMW M4 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The BMW M4 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The BMW M4 makes the most power at 353kW. The BMW M4 is quickest to 100km/h in 4.2s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · Best family cars