CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGWM Tank 500 vs Mazda CX-6e
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM Tank 500 vs Mazda CX-6e

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGWMMazda
Price (RRP)$59,990$59,106
Range (WLTP)484km
Battery77.9 kWh
Power255kW190kW
0-100 km/h8.5s
Max DC Charge150kW
10-80% Charge Time15 min
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km
Boot Space98L468L
Towing3,000kg1,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The GWM Tank 500 starts from $59,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-6e opens at $59,106. That makes the Mazda CX-6e the more affordable entry point by $884.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,989 and $65,017 respectively.

The Mazda CX-6e qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The GWM Tank 500, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the GWM Tank 500 and Mazda CX-6e hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-6e packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the GWM Tank 500.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Tank 500 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Mazda CX-6e. The Mazda CX-6e counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, ventilated seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The GWM Tank 500 uses a Hybrid producing 255kW and 648Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed auto to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-6e responds with a Electric making 190kW and 290Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels.

The GWM Tank 500 has the clear power advantage at 255kW vs 190kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GWM Tank 500 measures 5,078mm long on a 2,850mm wheelbase, 228mm longer than the Mazda CX-6e at 4,850mm (2,902mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-6e generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 98L in the GWM Tank 500 and 468L in the Mazda CX-6e, giving the Mazda CX-6e a 370L advantage. The GWM Tank 500 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the GWM Tank 500 leads with a 3,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m diameter

Average

GWM Tank 500 Lux
11.2m
GWM Tank 500
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 500) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-6e). The GWM Tank 500 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM Tank 500 if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-6e if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Tank 500 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-6e has a clear edge. The GWM Tank 500 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs