CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGWM Tank 500 vs Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM Tank 500 vs Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid: we're still completing 0-100km/h, ground clearance, turning circle, CO2 emissions and energy consumption.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecGWMChery
Price (RRP)$59,990$52,990
Fuel typeHybridPlug-in Hybrid
Range (WLTP)90km
Battery19 kWh
Electric range90km
Power255kW225kW
0-100 km/h8.5s
Max DC Charge41kW
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km1.5 kWh/100km
Boot Space795L143L
Towing3,000kg1,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the GWM Tank 500 & Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The GWM Tank 500 starts from $59,990 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid opens at $52,990. That makes the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid the more affordable entry point by $7,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,989 and $58,289 respectively.

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The GWM Tank 500, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid by roughly $11,755 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

19kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

22 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 41kW · 0–80%

28 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 41kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The GWM Tank 500 features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid gets a 15.6-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Tank 500 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate, Sony audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The GWM Tank 500 uses a Hybrid producing 255kW and 648Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed auto to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid responds with a 1.5L Turbocharged Petrol making 225kW and 450Nm, paired to a dedicated hybrid transmission (3dht) driving the front wheels.

The GWM Tank 500 has the clear power advantage at 255kW vs 225kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GWM Tank 500 measures 5,078mm long on a 2,850mm wheelbase, 278mm longer than the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid at 4,800mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Tank 500 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 795L in the GWM Tank 500 and 143L in the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid, giving the GWM Tank 500 a 652L advantage.

For towing, the GWM Tank 500 leads with a 3,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m diameter

Average

GWM Tank 500 Lux
11.2m
GWM Tank 500 Lux
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
GWM Tank 500 Turning circle · Ø 11.2 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.6 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the GWM Tank 500 and $72/year for the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid. That is a $2,351 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid.

Estimated annual total: $2,423 (GWM Tank 500) vs $72 (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid saves you roughly $2,351 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 500) vs 7 years (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —7yr (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM Tank 500 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Tank 500 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid will save you roughly $2,351 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Tank 500 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GWM Tank 500 and Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid?

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid is the cheapest at $52,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Tank 500 by $7,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid uses the least fuel at 1.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GWM Tank 500 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GWM Tank 500 has the largest boot at 795L.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Tank 500 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Tank 500 makes the most power at 255kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best electric SUVs