Jeep Grand Cherokee vs Mazda CX-90
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Jeep Grand Cherokee starts from $65,950 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-90 opens at $74,385. That makes the Jeep Grand Cherokee the more affordable entry point by $8,435.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $72,545 and $81,824 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-90 by roughly $2,425 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
The Mazda CX-90 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Jeep Grand Cherokee. Adult occupant protection scored 81% for the Jeep Grand Cherokee and 91% for the Mazda CX-90.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Jeep Grand Cherokee and 6 in the Mazda CX-90.
Feature Showdown
The Jeep Grand Cherokee features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-90 gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Jeep Grand Cherokee stands out with heated front seats that you will not find on the Mazda CX-90. The Mazda CX-90 counters with wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Jeep Grand Cherokee uses a Petrol V6 Pentastar w/ ESS producing 210kW and 344Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic w/ paddle shifters to a 4WD layout.
The Mazda CX-90 responds with a Petrol making 254kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.8 seconds.
The Mazda CX-90 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 210kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Jeep Grand Cherokee measures 4,914mm long on a 2,964mm wheelbase, 186mm shorter than the Mazda CX-90 at 5,100mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-90 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 1067L in the Jeep Grand Cherokee and 257L in the Mazda CX-90, giving the Jeep Grand Cherokee a 810L advantage. The Mazda CX-90 seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Jeep Grand Cherokee leads with a 2,813kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 813kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.0m diameter
Average
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,822/year for the Jeep Grand Cherokee and $2,337/year for the Mazda CX-90. That is a $485 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-90.
Estimated annual total: $2,822 (Jeep Grand Cherokee) vs $2,337 (Mazda CX-90). The Mazda CX-90 saves you roughly $485 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 100,000km (Jeep Grand Cherokee) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-90). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Jeep Grand Cherokee if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Jeep's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-90 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Jeep Grand Cherokee and Mazda CX-90 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mazda CX-90 will save you roughly $485 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Jeep Grand Cherokee has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
