CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsLDV D90 vs Mazda CX-5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

LDV D90 vs Mazda CX-5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecLDVMazda
Price (RRP)$39,990$39,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power184kW132kW
0-100 km/h10.5s8.7s
Fuel Economy9.1 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot Space343L438L
Towing3,000kg1,800kg
Warranty7yr / 200k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the LDV D90 & Mazda CX-5

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The LDV D90 starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-5 opens at $39,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $43,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-5 by roughly $2,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The LDV D90 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-5 gets a 15.6-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the LDV D90 gets leatherette upholstery while the Mazda CX-5 offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The LDV D90 uses a Petrol Turbo producing 184kW and 410Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-5 responds with a Petrol making 132kW and 242Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.

The LDV D90 has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 132kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-5 is 1.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The LDV D90 measures 5,046mm long on a 2,950mm wheelbase, 356mm longer than the Mazda CX-5 at 4,690mm (2,815mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the LDV D90 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 343L in the LDV D90 and 438L in the Mazda CX-5, giving the Mazda CX-5 a 95L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 2382L vs 1340L. The LDV D90 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the LDV D90 leads with a 3,000kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 12.0m

TightestMazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWDTightest turn at 11.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD
11.2mTighter
Best
LDV D90 Mode 2WD
12.0m
Worst
LDV D90 Mode 2WD
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda CX-5Tightest turn at 11.2m, needs the least road to swing around
LDV D9012.0 m
Average△ 3-point
Mazda CX-5Tightest11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,594/year for the LDV D90 and $2,109/year for the Mazda CX-5. That is a $485 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-5.

Estimated annual total: $2,594 (LDV D90) vs $2,109 (Mazda CX-5). The Mazda CX-5 saves you roughly $485 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 200,000km (LDV D90) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-5). The LDV D90 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the LDV D90 if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer LDV's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-5 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The LDV D90 and Mazda CX-5 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mazda CX-5 will save you roughly $485 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-5 has a clear edge. The LDV D90 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, LDV D90 and Mazda CX-5?

The LDV D90 is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-5 uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of LDV D90 and Mazda CX-5 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-5 has the largest boot at 438L.

Which can tow the most?

The LDV D90 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The LDV D90 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The LDV D90 makes the most power at 184kW. The Mazda CX-5 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.7s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs