Mazda CX-5 vs Suzuki S-Cross
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Mazda CX-5 & Suzuki S-Cross
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-5 starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki S-Cross opens at $43,490. That makes the Mazda CX-5 the more affordable entry point by $3,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $47,839 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki S-Cross by roughly $2,135 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-5 features a 12.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki S-Cross gets a 9-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mazda CX-5 stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Suzuki S-Cross. The Suzuki S-Cross counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-5 gets cloth upholstery while the Suzuki S-Cross offers synthetic leather.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-5 uses a Petrol producing 132kW and 242Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.7 seconds.
The Suzuki S-Cross responds with a Petrol making 103kW and 220Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.
The Mazda CX-5 has the clear power advantage at 132kW vs 103kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Mazda CX-5 is 1.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-5 measures 4,690mm long on a 2,815mm wheelbase, 385mm longer than the Suzuki S-Cross at 4,305mm (2,600mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-5 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 466L in the Mazda CX-5 and 430L in the Suzuki S-Cross, giving the Mazda CX-5 a 36L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1594L vs 1230L.
For towing, the Mazda CX-5 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.8m to 11.2m
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Mazda CX-5 and $1,682/year for the Suzuki S-Cross. That is a $427 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki S-Cross.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-5) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki S-Cross). The Mazda CX-5 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-5 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki S-Cross if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda CX-5 takes 6 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki S-Cross will save you roughly $427 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-5 has a clear edge. The Mazda CX-5 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-5 and Suzuki S-Cross?
The Mazda CX-5 is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki S-Cross by $3,500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki S-Cross uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Mazda CX-5 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Suzuki S-Cross, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-5 has the largest boot at 466L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mazda CX-5 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-5 makes the most power at 132kW. The Mazda CX-5 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.7s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!













