CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda MX-5 vs Kia K4
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda MX-5 vs Kia K4

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Mazda MX-5: we're still completing seat count, 0-100km/h and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecMazdaKia
Price (RRP)$31,990$32,090
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power96kW110kW
0-100 km/h9.8s
Fuel Economy6.1 L/100km6.1 L/100km
Boot Space130L438L
Towing1,100kg
Warranty3yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Mazda MX-5 & Kia K4

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda MX-5 starts from $31,990 before on-road costs, while the Kia K4 opens at $32,090. That makes the Mazda MX-5 the more affordable entry point by $100.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $35,189 and $35,299 respectively.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda MX-5 and Kia K4 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 5 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Kia K4, against 0 on the Mazda MX-5.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems. Airbag count is 4 in the Mazda MX-5 and 6 in the Kia K4.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Kia K4 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that the Mazda MX-5 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda MX-5 uses a 1.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT petrol (SKYACTIV-G) producing 96kW and 150Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual (skyactiv-mt) to a RWD layout.

The Kia K4 responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 180Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.8 seconds.

The Kia K4 has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 96kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda MX-5 measures 3,915mm long on a 2,310mm wheelbase, 525mm shorter than the Kia K4 at 4,440mm (2,720mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia K4 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 130L in the Mazda MX-5 and 438L in the Kia K4, giving the Kia K4 a 308L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.4m to 10.7m

TightestMazda MX-5 ND 1.5L Roadster ManualTightest turn at 9.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda MX-5 ND 1.5L Roadster Manual
9.4mTighter
Best
Kia K4 S
10.7m
Worst
Mazda MX-5 ND 1.5L Roadster Manual
9.4m · Excellent

Based on 9.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Kia K4 S
10.7m · Good

Based on 10.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda MX-5Tightest turn at 9.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda MX-5Tightest9.4 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Kia K410.7 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,739/year for the Mazda MX-5 and $1,739/year for the Kia K4.

Estimated annual total: $1,739 (Mazda MX-5) vs $1,739 (Kia K4). Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years (Mazda MX-5) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Kia K4). The Kia K4 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda MX-5 if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Kia K4 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Kia K4 takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Kia K4 has a clear edge. The Kia K4 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda MX-5 and Kia K4?

The Mazda MX-5 is the cheapest at $31,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Kia K4 by $100.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda MX-5 uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda MX-5 and Kia K4 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia K4 has the largest boot at 438L.

Which can tow the most?

The Kia K4 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,100kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia K4 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Kia K4 makes the most power at 110kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Convertibles · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars