CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda RX-8 vs BMW M2
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda RX-8 vs BMW M2

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Coupes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Mazda RX-8: we're still completing price, 0-100km/h, drive type and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecMazdaBMW
Price (RRP)TBC$123,900
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power170kW353kW
0-100 km/h4.2s
Fuel Economy12.9 L/100km9.6 L/100km
Boot Space290L390L
Towing1,000kg
Warranty3yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Mazda RX-8 & BMW M2

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The BMW M2 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, heated front seats and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda RX-8 uses a 1.3L RENESIS Rotary (2-rotor) producing 170kW and 211Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to the wheels.

The BMW M2 responds with a Petrol making 353kW and 600Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 4.2 seconds.

The BMW M2 has the clear power advantage at 353kW vs 170kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda RX-8 measures 4,470mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 110mm shorter than the BMW M2 at 4,580mm (2,747mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW M2 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 290L in the Mazda RX-8 and 390L in the BMW M2, giving the BMW M2 a 100L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.0m

TightestMazda RX-8 GTTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda RX-8 GT
10.6mTighter
Best
BMW M2 Coupe Auto
11.0m
Worst
Mazda RX-8 GT
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
BMW M2 Coupe Auto
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda RX-8Tightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda RX-8Tightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
BMW M211.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,677/year for the Mazda RX-8 and $2,736/year for the BMW M2. That is a $941 annual difference in favour of the BMW M2.

Warranty: 3 years (Mazda RX-8) vs 5 years / 999,999km (BMW M2). The BMW M2 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda RX-8 if: You or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the BMW M2 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The BMW M2 takes 4 of 4 key spec categories. The BMW M2 will save you roughly $941 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BMW M2 has a clear edge. The BMW M2 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda RX-8 and BMW M2?

The BMW M2 is the cheapest at $123,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BMW M2 uses the least fuel at 9.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Mazda RX-8 and BMW M2 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The BMW M2 has the largest boot at 390L.

Which can tow the most?

The BMW M2 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The BMW M2 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The BMW M2 makes the most power at 353kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · Best family cars