Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance vs Lotus Emeya
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance
From $189,900
Sedan
Hybrid
500kW
6.9 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
359L
Lotus Emeya
From $189,990
Sedan
Electric Motor
450kW
17.5 kWh/100km
—
509L
Price Breakdown
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance starts from $189,900 before on-road costs, while the Lotus Emeya opens at $189,990. That makes the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance the more affordable entry point by $90.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $208,890 and $208,989 respectively.
The Lotus Emeya qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance, as a petrol model, does not qualify.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Lotus Emeya by roughly $5,635 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats, ventilated seats and Burmester audio that you will not find on the Lotus Emeya. The Lotus Emeya counters with Apple CarPlay, V2L and KEF audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance uses a Hybrid producing 500kW and 1020Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.4 seconds.
The Lotus Emeya responds with a Electric Motor making 450kW and 710Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 4.2 seconds.
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has the clear power advantage at 500kW vs 450kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is 0.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance measures 4,842mm long on a 2,865mm wheelbase, 297mm shorter than the Lotus Emeya at 5,139mm (3,069mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Lotus Emeya generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 359L in the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance and 509L in the Lotus Emeya, giving the Lotus Emeya a 150L advantage.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance and $840/year for the Lotus Emeya. That is a $1,127 annual difference in favour of the Lotus Emeya.
Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance) vs $840 (Lotus Emeya). The Lotus Emeya saves you roughly $1,127 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Lotus Emeya). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Lotus Emeya if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Lotus's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Lotus Emeya will save you roughly $1,127 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Lotus Emeya has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
