CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG MG HS vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG MG HS vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$33,990$43,490
Range (WLTP)55km
Battery13.8 kWh
Power125kW96kW
0-100 km/h8.6s9.7s
Max DC Charge50kW
10-80% Charge Time38 min
Fuel Economy6.5 L/100km1.6 kWh/100km
Boot Space507L409L
Towing1,800kg1,500kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km10yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The MG MG HS starts from $33,990 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV opens at $43,490. That makes the MG MG HS the more affordable entry point by $9,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $37,389 and $47,839 respectively.

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The MG MG HS, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV by roughly $8,880 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the MG MG HS and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the MG MG HS and 97% for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the MG MG HS and 7 in the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV.

Feature Showdown

The MG MG HS features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG MG HS stands out with panoramic roof and power tailgate that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The MG MG HS uses a Petrol producing 125kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.6 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV responds with a Petrol making 96kW and 195Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.7 seconds.

The MG MG HS has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 96kW. In the real-world sprint, the MG MG HS is 1.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG MG HS measures 4,670mm long on a 2,765mm wheelbase, 125mm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV at 4,545mm (2,670mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG MG HS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 507L in the MG MG HS and 409L in the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV, giving the MG MG HS a 98L advantage.

For towing, the MG MG HS leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.0m

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ES
10.8mTighter
Best
MG MG HS Vibe
11.0m
Worst
MG MG HS
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,853/year for the MG MG HS and $77/year for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV. That is a $1,776 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV.

Estimated annual total: $1,853 (MG MG HS) vs $77 (Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV). The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV saves you roughly $1,776 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG MG HS) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG MG HS if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG MG HS takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV will save you roughly $1,776 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG MG HS has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG MG HS and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV?

The MG MG HS is the cheapest at $33,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV by $9,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV uses the least fuel at 1.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MG MG HS and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The MG MG HS has the largest boot at 507L.

Which can tow the most?

The MG MG HS has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG MG HS makes the most power at 125kW. The MG MG HS is quickest to 100km/h in 8.6s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs