CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG MG HS vs Toyota C-HR
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG MG HS vs Toyota C-HR

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGToyota
Price (RRP)$33,990$38,990
Power125kW112kW
0-100 km/h8.6s8.2s
Fuel Economy6.5 L/100km4.7 L/100km
Boot Space507L318L
Towing1,800kg1,200kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The MG MG HS starts from $33,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota C-HR opens at $38,990. That makes the MG MG HS the more affordable entry point by $5,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $37,389 and $42,889 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota C-HR by roughly $2,565 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the MG MG HS and Toyota C-HR hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the MG MG HS and 85% for the Toyota C-HR.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota C-HR packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the MG MG HS.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the MG MG HS and 7 in the Toyota C-HR.

Feature Showdown

The MG MG HS features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota C-HR gets a 10.5-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG MG HS stands out with Apple CarPlay, panoramic roof and power tailgate that you will not find on the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The MG MG HS uses a Petrol producing 125kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.6 seconds.

The Toyota C-HR responds with a Petrol making 112kW and 188Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.2 seconds.

The MG MG HS has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 112kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota C-HR is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG MG HS measures 4,670mm long on a 2,765mm wheelbase, 310mm longer than the Toyota C-HR at 4,360mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG MG HS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 507L in the MG MG HS and 318L in the Toyota C-HR, giving the MG MG HS a 189L advantage.

For towing, the MG MG HS leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 600kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 11.0m

Toyota C-HR GXL
10.4mTighter
Best
MG MG HS Vibe
11.0m
Worst
MG MG HS
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota C-HR
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,853/year for the MG MG HS and $1,340/year for the Toyota C-HR. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Toyota C-HR.

Estimated annual total: $1,853 (MG MG HS) vs $1,340 (Toyota C-HR). The Toyota C-HR saves you roughly $513 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG MG HS) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR). The MG MG HS has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG MG HS if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG MG HS takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Toyota C-HR will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG MG HS has a clear edge. The MG MG HS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG MG HS and Toyota C-HR?

The MG MG HS is the cheapest at $33,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota C-HR by $5,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota C-HR uses the least fuel at 4.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MG MG HS and Toyota C-HR all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The MG MG HS has the largest boot at 507L.

Which can tow the most?

The MG MG HS has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG MG HS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG MG HS makes the most power at 125kW. The Toyota C-HR is quickest to 100km/h in 8.2s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs