CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi Lancer vs Subaru WRX
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi Lancer vs Subaru WRX

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiSubaru
Price (RRP)TBC$48,190
Fuel typepetrolPetrol
Power125kW202kW
0-100 km/h6.4s
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km9.9 L/100km
Boot Space377L414L
Towing1,000kg
Warranty5yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Mitsubishi Lancer & Subaru WRX

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Subaru WRX counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and Harman Kardon audio that the Mitsubishi Lancer does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi Lancer lines up producing 125kW and 226Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a front-wheel drive layout.

The Subaru WRX responds with a Petrol making 202kW and 350Nm, paired to a manual driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.4 seconds.

The Subaru WRX has the clear power advantage at 202kW vs 125kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi Lancer measures 4,625mm long on a 2,635mm wheelbase, 45mm shorter than the Subaru WRX at 4,670mm (2,675mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Subaru WRX generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 377L in the Mitsubishi Lancer and 414L in the Subaru WRX, giving the Subaru WRX a 37L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.0m to 11.2m

TightestMitsubishi Lancer XLS 2.4 Sedan CVTTightest turn at 10.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi Lancer XLS 2.4 Sedan CVT
10.0mTighter
Best
Subaru WRX AWD Sedan Manual
11.2m
Worst
Mitsubishi Lancer XLS 2.4 Sedan CVT
10.0m · Good

Based on 10.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Subaru WRX AWD Sedan Manual
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi LancerTightest turn at 10.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Mitsubishi LancerTightest10.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Subaru WRX11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Mitsubishi Lancer and $2,822/year for the Subaru WRX. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Lancer.

Estimated annual total: $2,423 (Mitsubishi Lancer) vs $2,822 (Subaru WRX). The Mitsubishi Lancer saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 100,000km (Mitsubishi Lancer) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru WRX). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi Lancer if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Subaru WRX if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mitsubishi Lancer and Subaru WRX trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mitsubishi Lancer will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Subaru WRX has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Lancer and Subaru WRX?

The Subaru WRX is the cheapest at $48,190 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Lancer uses the least fuel at 8.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Lancer all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Subaru WRX has the largest boot at 414L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mitsubishi Lancer has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Subaru WRX makes the most power at 202kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars