CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi Outlander vs Mazda CX-5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi Outlander vs Mazda CX-5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiMazda
Price (RRP)$39,990$39,990
Power135kW132kW
0-100 km/h8.7s8.7s
Fuel Economy7.3 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot Space478L522L
Towing2,000kg2,000kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mitsubishi Outlander starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-5 opens at $39,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $43,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mitsubishi Outlander and Mazda CX-5 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Mitsubishi Outlander and 95% for the Mazda CX-5.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-5 packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Mitsubishi Outlander.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mitsubishi Outlander and 6 in the Mazda CX-5.

Feature Showdown

The Mitsubishi Outlander features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-5 gets a 12.9-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi Outlander uses a Petrol producing 135kW and 244Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.7 seconds.

The Mazda CX-5 responds with a Petrol making 132kW and 242Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Outlander has the clear power advantage at 135kW vs 132kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi Outlander measures 4,710mm long on a 2,705mm wheelbase, 135mm longer than the Mazda CX-5 at 4,575mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Outlander generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 478L in the Mitsubishi Outlander and 522L in the Mazda CX-5, giving the Mazda CX-5 a 44L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-5 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.0m

Mitsubishi Outlander ES 2WD
11.0mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD
11.0m
Best
Mitsubishi Outlander
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-5
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,081/year for the Mitsubishi Outlander and $2,109/year for the Mazda CX-5. That is a $28 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Outlander.

Estimated annual total: $2,081 (Mitsubishi Outlander) vs $2,109 (Mazda CX-5). The Mitsubishi Outlander saves you roughly $28 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Outlander) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-5). The Mitsubishi Outlander has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi Outlander if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-5 if: You need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi Outlander takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Mitsubishi Outlander will save you roughly $28 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-5 has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Outlander adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs