CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Enyaq vs Tesla Model Y
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Enyaq vs Tesla Model Y

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaTesla
Price (RRP)$59,990$58,900
Fuel typeElectricElectric
Range (WLTP)575km466km
Battery82 kWh60 kWh
Power210kW255kW
0-100 km/h6.7s5.9s
Max DC Charge175kW175kW
10-80% Charge Time21 min16 min
Boot Space585L854L
Towing1,000kg1,600kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / 0k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Skoda Enyaq & Tesla Model Y

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Enyaq starts from $59,990 before on-road costs, while the Tesla Model Y opens at $58,900. That makes the Tesla Model Y the more affordable entry point by $1,090.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,989 and $64,790 respectively.

Both models currently qualify for the electric-vehicle Fringe Benefits Tax exemption (battery-electric and under the $91,661 threshold; battery-electric and under the $91,661 threshold), a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases.

Safety Rundown

Both the Skoda Enyaq and Tesla Model Y hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 94% for the Skoda Enyaq and 91% for the Tesla Model Y.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 8 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Tesla Model Y, against 5 on the Skoda Enyaq.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the Skoda Enyaq and 8 in the Tesla Model Y.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

77kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 14m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 175kW · 0–80%

26 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 175kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

57.5kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

55 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 175kW · 0–80%

20 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 175kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Skoda Enyaq features a 13-inch touchscreen paired with a 5.3-inch digital dash, while the Tesla Model Y gets a 16-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Skoda Enyaq stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats and ventilated seats — features our data doesn't list for the Tesla Model Y. The Tesla Model Y counters with Apple CarPlay, panoramic roof and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Skoda Enyaq gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Tesla Model Y offers vegan leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Skoda Enyaq and 2-zone in the Tesla Model Y.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Enyaq uses a Electric Motor producing 210kW and 545Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.

The Tesla Model Y responds with a Electric Motor making 255kW and 340Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.9 seconds.

The Tesla Model Y has the clear power advantage at 255kW vs 210kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Tesla Model Y is 0.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 82kWh (Skoda Enyaq) vs 60kWh (Tesla Model Y), giving WLTP ranges of 575km and 466km. DC fast charging peaks at 175kW (Skoda Enyaq) vs 175kW (Tesla Model Y).

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Enyaq measures 4,658mm long on a 2,766mm wheelbase, 134mm shorter than the Tesla Model Y at 4,792mm (2,890mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Tesla Model Y generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 585L in the Skoda Enyaq and 854L in the Tesla Model Y, giving the Tesla Model Y a 269L advantage.

For towing, the Tesla Model Y leads with a 1,600kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 600kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 12.1m

TightestSkoda Enyaq 85 SportlineTightest turn at 9.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Skoda Enyaq 85 Sportline
9.3mTighter
Best
Tesla Model Y RWD
12.1m
Worst
Skoda Enyaq 85 Sportline
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Tesla Model Y RWD
12.1m · Large

Based on 12.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSkoda EnyaqTightest turn at 9.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Skoda EnyaqTightest9.3 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Tesla Model Y12.1 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Enyaq) vs 5 years (Tesla Model Y). The Skoda Enyaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Enyaq if: You value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Tesla Model Y if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Tesla's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Tesla Model Y takes 6 of 9 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Tesla Model Y has a clear edge. The Skoda Enyaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Enyaq and Tesla Model Y?

The Tesla Model Y is the cheapest at $58,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Enyaq by $1,090.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Skoda Enyaq has the most range at 547km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Skoda Enyaq accepts the highest DC charging at up to 175kW.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Skoda Enyaq and Tesla Model Y all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Tesla Model Y has the largest boot at 854L.

Which can tow the most?

The Tesla Model Y has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,600kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Enyaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Tesla Model Y makes the most power at 255kW. The Tesla Model Y is quickest to 100km/h in 5.9s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs