CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Enyaq vs Mercedes-Benz EQA
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Enyaq vs Mercedes-Benz EQA

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)$83,990$79,900
Range (WLTP)575km480km
Battery82 kWh66.5 kWh
Power210kW140kW
0-100 km/h5.4s8.6s
Max DC Charge175kW100kW
10-80% Charge Time21 min31 min
Fuel Economy15 kWh/100km
Boot Space585L340L
Towing1,800kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Enyaq starts from $83,990 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz EQA opens at $79,900. That makes the Mercedes-Benz EQA the more affordable entry point by $4,090.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $92,389 and $87,890 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Skoda Enyaq stands out with head-up display, heated front seats and ventilated seats that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz EQA. The Mercedes-Benz EQA counters with ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Enyaq uses a Electric Motor producing 210kW and 545Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5.4 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz EQA responds with a Electric making 140kW and 375Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.6 seconds.

The Skoda Enyaq has the clear power advantage at 210kW vs 140kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Enyaq is 3.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 82kWh (Skoda Enyaq) vs 66.5kWh (Mercedes-Benz EQA), giving WLTP ranges of 575km and 480km. DC fast charging peaks at 175kW (Skoda Enyaq) vs 100kW (Mercedes-Benz EQA).

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Enyaq measures 4,659mm long on a 2,766mm wheelbase, 196mm longer than the Mercedes-Benz EQA at 4,463mm (2,729mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Enyaq generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 585L in the Skoda Enyaq and 340L in the Mercedes-Benz EQA, giving the Skoda Enyaq a 245L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m diameter

Good

Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA250
11.0m
Mercedes-Benz EQA
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Skoda Enyaq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz EQA). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Enyaq if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz EQA if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Enyaq takes 7 of 8 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Skoda Enyaq has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs