CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMercedes-Benz EQA vs Volvo EX40
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Volvo EX40

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMercedes-BenzVolvo
Price (RRP)$79,900$69,990
Range (WLTP)480km520km
Battery66.5 kWh82 kWh
Power140kW185kW
0-100 km/h8.6s7.3s
Max DC Charge100kW150kW
10-80% Charge Time31 min28 min
Boot Space340L536L
Towing1,800kg1,800kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Price Breakdown

The Mercedes-Benz EQA starts from $79,900 before on-road costs, while the Volvo EX40 opens at $69,990. That makes the Volvo EX40 the more affordable entry point by $9,910.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $87,890 and $76,989 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mercedes-Benz EQA features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Volvo EX40 gets a 9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mercedes-Benz EQA stands out with ambient lighting that you will not find on the Volvo EX40. The Volvo EX40 counters with head-up display, heated front seats and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mercedes-Benz EQA gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Volvo EX40 offers textile/leather blend.

Drivetrain

The Mercedes-Benz EQA uses a Electric producing 140kW and 375Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.6 seconds.

The Volvo EX40 responds with a Electric making 185kW and 420Nm, paired to a single-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.3 seconds.

The Volvo EX40 has the clear power advantage at 185kW vs 140kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volvo EX40 is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 66.5kWh (Mercedes-Benz EQA) vs 82kWh (Volvo EX40), giving WLTP ranges of 480km and 520km. DC fast charging peaks at 100kW (Mercedes-Benz EQA) vs 150kW (Volvo EX40).

Space & Comfort

The Mercedes-Benz EQA measures 4,463mm long on a 2,729mm wheelbase, 23mm longer than the Volvo EX40 at 4,440mm (2,702mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mercedes-Benz EQA generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 340L in the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 536L in the Volvo EX40, giving the Volvo EX40 a 196L advantage.

For towing, the Volvo EX40 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.4m

Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA250
11.0mTighter
Best
Volvo EX40 Plus Single Motor
11.4m
Worst
Mercedes-Benz EQA
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volvo EX40
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz EQA) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo EX40). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mercedes-Benz EQA if: You or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo EX40 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volvo EX40 takes 8 of 8 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Volvo EX40 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mercedes-Benz EQA and Volvo EX40?

The Volvo EX40 is the cheapest at $69,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mercedes-Benz EQA by $9,910.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Volvo EX40 has the most range at 520km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Volvo EX40 accepts the highest DC charging at up to 150kW.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mercedes-Benz EQA all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volvo EX40 has the largest boot at 536L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mercedes-Benz EQA has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo EX40 makes the most power at 185kW. The Volvo EX40 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.3s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs