CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Octavia vs Mazda 6
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Octavia vs Mazda 6

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaMazda
Price (RRP)$39,990$29,740
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power110kW125kW
0-100 km/h8.7s
Fuel Economy5.7 L/100km8.4 L/100km
Boot Space600L519L
Towing1,500kg1,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited3yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Skoda Octavia & Mazda 6

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Octavia starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda 6 opens at $29,740. That makes the Mazda 6 the more affordable entry point by $10,250.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $32,714 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Octavia by roughly $3,845 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Skoda Octavia and Mazda 6 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Skoda Octavia packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Mazda 6.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems. Airbag count is 8 in the Skoda Octavia and 6 in the Mazda 6.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Skoda Octavia stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Mazda 6. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Octavia uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.7 seconds.

The Mazda 6 responds with a 2.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT making 125kW and 226Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual / 5-speed automatic driving the front wheels.

The Mazda 6 has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Octavia measures 4,698mm long on a 2,686mm wheelbase, 37mm shorter than the Mazda 6 at 4,735mm (2,725mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda 6 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 600L in the Skoda Octavia and 519L in the Mazda 6, giving the Skoda Octavia a 81L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda 6 leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 11.0m

TightestSkoda Octavia Sedan 110TSITightest turn at 10.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Skoda Octavia Sedan 110TSI
10.4mTighter
Best
Mazda 6 Limited
11.0m
Worst
Skoda Octavia Sedan 110TSI
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda 6 Limited
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSkoda OctaviaTightest turn at 10.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Skoda OctaviaTightest10.4 m
Good△ 3-point
Mazda 611.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,625/year for the Skoda Octavia and $2,394/year for the Mazda 6. That is a $769 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Octavia.

Estimated annual total: $1,625 (Skoda Octavia) vs $2,394 (Mazda 6). The Skoda Octavia saves you roughly $769 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Octavia) vs 3 years (Mazda 6). The Skoda Octavia has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Octavia if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda 6 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Octavia takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Skoda Octavia will save you roughly $769 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Octavia has a clear edge. The Skoda Octavia adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Octavia and Mazda 6?

The Mazda 6 is the cheapest at $29,740 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Octavia by $10,250.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Octavia uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Skoda Octavia and Mazda 6 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Octavia has the largest boot at 600L.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Octavia has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Octavia has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda 6 makes the most power at 125kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars