CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMINI Aceman vs Omoda 9
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MINI Aceman vs Omoda 9

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMINIOmoda
Price (RRP)$60,990$61,990
Range (WLTP)352km169km
Battery54.2 kWh34 kWh
Power160kW105kW
0-100 km/h7.1s4.9s
Max DC Charge95kW70kW
10-80% Charge Time31 min25 min
Fuel Economy1.4 kWh/100km
Boot Space300L660L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km8yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The MINI Aceman starts from $60,990 before on-road costs, while the Omoda 9 opens at $61,990. That makes the MINI Aceman the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $67,089 and $68,189 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

Both the MINI Aceman and Omoda 9 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 83% for the MINI Aceman and 90% for the Omoda 9.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 7 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the MINI Aceman and 8 in the Omoda 9. The Omoda 9 adds a 360-degree camera that the MINI Aceman misses.

Feature Showdown

The MINI Aceman features a 9.4-inch touchscreen, while the Omoda 9 gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MINI Aceman stands out with Harman Kardon audio that you will not find on the Omoda 9. The Omoda 9 counters with head-up display, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate and Sony audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The MINI Aceman uses a Electric producing 160kW and 330Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.1 seconds.

The Omoda 9 responds with a Plug-in Hybrid making 105kW and 215Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 4.9 seconds.

The MINI Aceman has the clear power advantage at 160kW vs 105kW. In the real-world sprint, the Omoda 9 is 2.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 54.2kWh (MINI Aceman) vs 34kWh (Omoda 9), giving WLTP ranges of 352km and 169km. DC fast charging peaks at 95kW (MINI Aceman) vs 70kW (Omoda 9).

Space & Comfort

The MINI Aceman measures 4,073mm long on a 2,606mm wheelbase, 702mm shorter than the Omoda 9 at 4,775mm (2,800mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Omoda 9 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 300L in the MINI Aceman and 660L in the Omoda 9, giving the Omoda 9 a 360L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.4m

MINI Aceman SE Favoured
10.6mTighter
Best
Omoda 9 SHS Virtue AWD
11.4m
Worst
MINI Aceman
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Omoda 9
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (MINI Aceman) vs 8 years / 999,999km (Omoda 9). The Omoda 9 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MINI Aceman if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer MINI's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Omoda 9 if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Omoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The MINI Aceman and Omoda 9 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Omoda 9 has a clear edge. The Omoda 9 adds peace of mind with a longer 8-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MINI Aceman and Omoda 9?

The MINI Aceman is the cheapest at $60,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Omoda 9 by $1,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Omoda 9 uses the least fuel at 1.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MINI Aceman and Omoda 9 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Omoda 9 has the largest boot at 660L.

Which can tow the most?

The Omoda 9 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Omoda 9 has the longest warranty at 8 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MINI Aceman makes the most power at 160kW. The Omoda 9 is quickest to 100km/h in 4.9s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs