CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-60 vs Toyota Kluger
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-60 vs Toyota Kluger

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaToyota
Price (RRP)$44,240$62,410
Power138kW184kW
0-100 km/h7.4s7.9s
Fuel Economy6.7 L/100km5.6 L/100km
Boot Space570L241L
Towing2,000kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-60 starts from $44,240 before on-road costs, while the Toyota Kluger opens at $62,410. That makes the Mazda CX-60 the more affordable entry point by $18,170.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $48,664 and $68,651 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota Kluger by roughly $1,570 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-60 and Toyota Kluger hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 91% for the Mazda CX-60 and 96% for the Toyota Kluger.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota Kluger packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Mazda CX-60.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-60 and 7 in the Toyota Kluger.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-60 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota Kluger gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-60 uses a Petrol producing 138kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.4 seconds.

The Toyota Kluger responds with a 2.5L 4-cyl Hybrid making 184kW and 242Nm, paired to a cvt driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.9 seconds.

The Toyota Kluger has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 138kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-60 measures 4,745mm long on a 2,870mm wheelbase, 221mm shorter than the Toyota Kluger at 4,966mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 570L in the Mazda CX-60 and 241L in the Toyota Kluger, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 329L advantage. The Toyota Kluger seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Toyota Kluger leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 11.4m

Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
11.4mTighter
Best
Toyota Kluger GX Hybrid AWD
11.4m
Best
Mazda CX-60
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Kluger
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the Mazda CX-60 and $1,596/year for the Toyota Kluger. That is a $314 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Kluger.

Estimated annual total: $1,910 (Mazda CX-60) vs $1,596 (Toyota Kluger). The Toyota Kluger saves you roughly $314 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Kluger). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Kluger if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-60 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Toyota Kluger will save you roughly $314 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-60 and Toyota Kluger?

The Mazda CX-60 is the cheapest at $44,240 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota Kluger by $18,170.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Kluger uses the least fuel at 5.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-60 and Toyota Kluger all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-60 has the largest boot at 570L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-60 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Kluger makes the most power at 184kW. The Mazda CX-60 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.4s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs