Mazda CX-60 vs Volkswagen T-Roc
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Mazda CX-60 & Volkswagen T-Roc
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-60 starts from $45,640 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen T-Roc opens at $41,990. That makes the Volkswagen T-Roc the more affordable entry point by $3,650.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $50,204 and $46,189 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volkswagen T-Roc by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-60 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen T-Roc gets a 8-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mazda CX-60 stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Volkswagen T-Roc. The Volkswagen T-Roc counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-60 uses a Petrol producing 138kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.4 seconds.
The Volkswagen T-Roc responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.
The Mazda CX-60 has the clear power advantage at 138kW vs 110kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Mazda CX-60 is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-60 measures 4,740mm long on a 2,870mm wheelbase, 489mm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc at 4,251mm (2,603mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 570L in the Mazda CX-60 and 445L in the Volkswagen T-Roc, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 125L advantage.
For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.8m to 11.1m
Based on 10.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,138/year for the Mazda CX-60 and $1,796/year for the Volkswagen T-Roc. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen T-Roc.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen T-Roc). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Volkswagen T-Roc if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda CX-60 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Volkswagen T-Roc will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-60 and Volkswagen T-Roc?
The Volkswagen T-Roc is the cheapest at $41,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-60 by $3,650.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Volkswagen T-Roc uses the least fuel at 6.3L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Mazda CX-60 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Volkswagen T-Roc, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-60 has the largest boot at 570L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-60 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-60 makes the most power at 138kW. The Mazda CX-60 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.4s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
