CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsPeugeot 2008 vs Volkswagen T-Roc
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Peugeot 2008 vs Volkswagen T-Roc

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecPeugeotVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$42,490$41,990
Fuel typeHybridPetrol
Power107kW110kW
0-100 km/h8.3s8.7s
Fuel Economy4.4 L/100km6.3 L/100km
Boot Space434L445L
Towing1,100kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 200k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Peugeot 2008 & Volkswagen T-Roc

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Peugeot 2008 starts from $42,490 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen T-Roc opens at $41,990. That makes the Volkswagen T-Roc the more affordable entry point by $500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $46,739 and $46,189 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Peugeot 2008 by roughly $2,710 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Peugeot 2008 features a 10-inch touchscreen paired with a 10-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen T-Roc gets a 8-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Peugeot 2008 stands out with Focal audio that you will not find on the Volkswagen T-Roc. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Peugeot 2008 uses a Hybrid producing 107kW and 230Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.3 seconds.

The Volkswagen T-Roc responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.

The Volkswagen T-Roc has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 107kW. In the real-world sprint, the Peugeot 2008 is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Peugeot 2008 measures 4,300mm long on a 2,605mm wheelbase, 49mm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc at 4,251mm (2,603mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Peugeot 2008 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 434L in the Peugeot 2008 and 445L in the Volkswagen T-Roc, giving the Volkswagen T-Roc a 11L advantage.

For towing, the Volkswagen T-Roc leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,100kg. That 400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.1m

TightestPeugeot 2008 Allure HybridTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Peugeot 2008 Allure Hybrid
10.6mTighter
Best
Volkswagen T-Roc Style 110TSI
11.1m
Worst
Peugeot 2008 Allure Hybrid
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen T-Roc Style 110TSI
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestPeugeot 2008Tightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Peugeot 2008Tightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Volkswagen T-Roc11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,254/year for the Peugeot 2008 and $1,796/year for the Volkswagen T-Roc. That is a $542 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot 2008.

Estimated annual total: $1,254 (Peugeot 2008) vs $1,796 (Volkswagen T-Roc). The Peugeot 2008 saves you roughly $542 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 200,000km (Peugeot 2008) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen T-Roc). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Peugeot 2008 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen T-Roc if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volkswagen T-Roc takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Peugeot 2008 will save you roughly $542 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Peugeot 2008 and Volkswagen T-Roc?

The Volkswagen T-Roc is the cheapest at $41,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Peugeot 2008 by $500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Peugeot 2008 uses the least fuel at 4.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Peugeot 2008 and Volkswagen T-Roc carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volkswagen T-Roc has the largest boot at 445L.

Which can tow the most?

The Volkswagen T-Roc has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volkswagen T-Roc makes the most power at 110kW. The Peugeot 2008 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.3s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best mid-size SUVs