CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHonda CR-V vs Volkswagen T-Roc
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Honda CR-V vs Volkswagen T-Roc

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHondaVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$37,000$41,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power140kW110kW
0-100 km/h8.2s8.7s
Fuel Economy7.1 L/100km6.3 L/100km
Boot Space589L445L
Towing1,500kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety4 StarsNo data

Track the Honda CR-V & Volkswagen T-Roc

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Honda CR-V starts from $37,000 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen T-Roc opens at $41,990. That makes the Honda CR-V the more affordable entry point by $4,990.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $40,700 and $46,189 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volkswagen T-Roc by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Honda CR-V features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen T-Roc gets a 8-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Honda CR-V stands out with Apple CarPlay and power tailgate that you will not find on the Volkswagen T-Roc. The Volkswagen T-Roc counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Honda CR-V gets leather upholstery while the Volkswagen T-Roc offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Honda CR-V uses a Petrol producing 140kW and 240Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.2 seconds.

The Volkswagen T-Roc responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.

The Honda CR-V has the clear power advantage at 140kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Honda CR-V is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Honda CR-V measures 4,704mm long on a 2,701mm wheelbase, 453mm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc at 4,251mm (2,603mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Honda CR-V generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 589L in the Honda CR-V and 445L in the Volkswagen T-Roc, giving the Honda CR-V a 144L advantage.

For towing, the Volkswagen T-Roc leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m to 12.0m

TightestVolkswagen T-Roc Style 110TSITightest turn at 11.1m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volkswagen T-Roc Style 110TSI
11.1mTighter
Best
Honda CR-V VTi L
12.0m
Worst
Honda CR-V VTi L
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen T-Roc Style 110TSI
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolkswagen T-RocTightest turn at 11.1m, needs the least road to swing around
Honda CR-V12.0 m
Average△ 3-point
Volkswagen T-RocTightest11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,024/year for the Honda CR-V and $1,796/year for the Volkswagen T-Roc. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen T-Roc.

Estimated annual total: $2,024 (Honda CR-V) vs $1,796 (Volkswagen T-Roc). The Volkswagen T-Roc saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Honda CR-V) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen T-Roc). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 5yr (Honda CR-V)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Honda CR-V if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Honda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen T-Roc if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Honda CR-V takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Volkswagen T-Roc will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Honda CR-V has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Honda CR-V and Volkswagen T-Roc?

The Honda CR-V is the cheapest at $37,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volkswagen T-Roc by $4,990.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen T-Roc uses the least fuel at 6.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Honda CR-V all hold a 4-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Honda CR-V has the largest boot at 589L.

Which can tow the most?

The Honda CR-V has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Honda CR-V makes the most power at 140kW. The Honda CR-V is quickest to 100km/h in 8.2s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs