CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-60 vs Toyota RAV4
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-60 vs Toyota RAV4

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaToyota
Price (RRP)$44,240$45,990
Power138kW143kW
0-100 km/h7.4s8.4s
Fuel Economy6.7 L/100km6.6 L/100km
Boot Space570L580L
Towing2,000kg800kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-60 starts from $44,240 before on-road costs, while the Toyota RAV4 opens at $45,990. That makes the Mazda CX-60 the more affordable entry point by $1,750.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $48,664 and $50,589 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-60 and Toyota RAV4 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 91% for the Mazda CX-60 and 93% for the Toyota RAV4.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota RAV4 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Mazda CX-60.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-60 and 8 in the Toyota RAV4.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-60 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota RAV4 gets a 10.5-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-60 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Toyota RAV4. The Toyota RAV4 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-60 uses a Petrol producing 138kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.4 seconds.

The Toyota RAV4 responds with a Petrol Hybrid making 143kW and 221Nm, paired to a cvt (e-cvt) driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.4 seconds.

The Toyota RAV4 has the clear power advantage at 143kW vs 138kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-60 measures 4,745mm long on a 2,870mm wheelbase, 145mm longer than the Toyota RAV4 at 4,600mm (2,690mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 570L in the Mazda CX-60 and 580L in the Toyota RAV4, giving the Toyota RAV4 a 10L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 800kg. That 1,200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.4m

Toyota RAV4 GX Hybrid 2WD
10.6mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
11.4m
Worst
Mazda CX-60
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota RAV4
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the Mazda CX-60 and $1,881/year for the Toyota RAV4. That is a $29 annual difference in favour of the Toyota RAV4.

Estimated annual total: $1,910 (Mazda CX-60) vs $1,881 (Toyota RAV4). The Toyota RAV4 saves you roughly $29 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60) vs 5 years (Toyota RAV4). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota RAV4 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mazda CX-60 and Toyota RAV4 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Toyota RAV4 will save you roughly $29 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs