Suzuki Fronx vs Toyota RAV4
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Suzuki Fronx & Toyota RAV4
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Suzuki Fronx starts from $28,490 before on-road costs, while the Toyota RAV4 opens at $28,490. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $31,339 and $31,339 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Fronx by roughly $3,990 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
The Toyota RAV4 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 1 stars for the Suzuki Fronx.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Suzuki Fronx packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Toyota RAV4.
Both include the essentials: core safety systems. Airbag count is 6 in the Suzuki Fronx and 7 in the Toyota RAV4.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Suzuki Fronx stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Toyota RAV4. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Suzuki Fronx gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Toyota RAV4 offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The Suzuki Fronx uses a Petrol producing 75.8kW and 137Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.
The Toyota RAV4 responds with a Petrol making 107kW and 187Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual driving the front wheels.
The Toyota RAV4 has the clear power advantage at 107kW vs 75.8kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Suzuki Fronx measures 3,995mm long on a 2,520mm wheelbase, 575mm shorter than the Toyota RAV4 at 4,570mm (2,660mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota RAV4 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 304L in the Suzuki Fronx and 577L in the Toyota RAV4, giving the Toyota RAV4 a 273L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 10.6m
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,397/year for the Suzuki Fronx and $2,195/year for the Toyota RAV4. That is a $798 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Fronx.
Estimated annual total: $1,397 (Suzuki Fronx) vs $2,195 (Toyota RAV4). The Suzuki Fronx saves you roughly $798 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Toyota RAV4). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota RAV4 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Toyota RAV4 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The Suzuki Fronx will save you roughly $798 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota RAV4 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Suzuki Fronx and Toyota RAV4?
The Suzuki Fronx is the cheapest at $28,490 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Fronx uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The Toyota RAV4 has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the most boot space?
The Toyota RAV4 has the largest boot at 577L.
Which is the most powerful?
The Toyota RAV4 makes the most power at 107kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
