Omoda 5 vs Suzuki Fronx
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 30 Aug 2026, price 20 Oct 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$27,990RRP
- no option data for this car
$27,250est. RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Omoda 5 & Suzuki Fronx
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Omoda 5 starts from $27,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Fronx opens at $27,250 (our estimated RRP; the brand lists drive-away prices only). Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $30,789 and $29,975 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Fronx by roughly $2,850 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
The Omoda 5 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 1 stars for the Suzuki Fronx. Adult occupant protection scored 87% for the Omoda 5 and 48% for the Suzuki Fronx.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Suzuki Fronx, against 5 on the Omoda 5.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Omoda 5 and 6 in the Suzuki Fronx.
Recalls on our record
Omoda 5
- REC-005891 · published 8 Feb 2024Due to a manufacturing defect, the bolt securing the brake pipe union may not have been tightened sufficiently.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2023
Suzuki Fronx
- REC-006521 · published 23 Dec 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the left rear seat belt retractor mechanism may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2025
- REC-006520 · published 23 Dec 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the left rear seat belt retractor mechanism may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2025
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Omoda 5 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Fronx gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Omoda 5 stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Suzuki Fronx. The Suzuki Fronx counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Omoda 5 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Suzuki Fronx responds with a Petrol making 75.8kW and 137Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.
The Omoda 5 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 75.8kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Omoda 5 is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Omoda 5 measures 4,307mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 312mm longer than the Suzuki Fronx at 3,995mm (2,520mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Omoda 5 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 358L in the Omoda 5 and 304L in the Suzuki Fronx, giving the Omoda 5 a 54L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 10.6m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Omoda 5 and $1,397/year for the Suzuki Fronx. That is a $570 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Fronx.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Omoda 5) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx). The Omoda 5 has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Omoda 5)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Omoda 5 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Omoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Omoda 5: Top CarSorted Score, 76 vs 67
The Omoda 5 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (76 vs 67), taking 6 of 7 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Omoda 5 ahead by 34), fuel economy (Suzuki Fronx ahead by 18), practicality (Omoda 5 ahead by 12). The Suzuki Fronx will save you roughly $570 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Omoda 5 has a clear edge. The Omoda 5 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Omoda 5 and Suzuki Fronx?
The Suzuki Fronx is the cheapest at $27,250 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Omoda 5 by $740.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Fronx uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The Omoda 5 has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the most boot space?
The Omoda 5 has the largest boot at 358L with the seats up.
Which can tow the most?
The Omoda 5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Omoda 5 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Omoda 5 makes the most power at 108kW. The Omoda 5 is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
