Omoda 5 vs Suzuki Fronx
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Omoda 5 starts from $25,490 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Fronx opens at $28,490. That makes the Omoda 5 the more affordable entry point by $3,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $28,039 and $31,339 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Fronx by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Omoda 5 and Suzuki Fronx hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Omoda 5 and 48% for the Suzuki Fronx.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Omoda 5 and 6 in the Suzuki Fronx.
Feature Showdown
The Omoda 5 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Fronx gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Drivetrain
The Omoda 5 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Suzuki Fronx responds with a Petrol making 74kW and 147Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.
The Omoda 5 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 74kW. In the real-world sprint, the Omoda 5 is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Omoda 5 measures 4,307mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 312mm longer than the Suzuki Fronx at 3,995mm (2,520mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Omoda 5 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 358L in the Omoda 5 and 308L in the Suzuki Fronx, giving the Omoda 5 a 50L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 10.6m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Omoda 5 and $1,682/year for the Suzuki Fronx. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Fronx.
Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Omoda 5) vs $1,682 (Suzuki Fronx). The Suzuki Fronx saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Omoda 5) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx). The Omoda 5 has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Omoda 5)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Omoda 5 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Omoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Omoda 5 takes 6 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki Fronx will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Omoda 5 has a clear edge. The Omoda 5 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Omoda 5 and Suzuki Fronx?
The Omoda 5 is the cheapest at $25,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Fronx by $3,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Fronx uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Omoda 5 and Suzuki Fronx all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Omoda 5 has the largest boot at 358L.
Which can tow the most?
The Omoda 5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Omoda 5 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Omoda 5 makes the most power at 108kW. The Omoda 5 is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
