Mazda CX-30 vs Omoda 5
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Mazda CX-30
From $29,990
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
114kW
6.3 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
317L
Omoda 5
From $27,990
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
108kW
6.9 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
358L
Track the Mazda CX-30 & Omoda 5
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-30 starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Omoda 5 opens at $27,990. That makes the Omoda 5 the more affordable entry point by $2,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $30,789 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-30 features a 8.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Omoda 5 gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-30 gets cloth upholstery while the Omoda 5 offers synthetic leather.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-30 uses a Petrol producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.
The Omoda 5 responds with a Petrol making 108kW and 210Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.
The Mazda CX-30 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 108kW. In the real-world sprint, the Omoda 5 is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-30 measures 4,395mm long on a 2,655mm wheelbase, 88mm longer than the Omoda 5 at 4,307mm (2,610mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-30 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 317L in the Mazda CX-30 and 358L in the Omoda 5, giving the Omoda 5 a 41L advantage.
For towing, the Omoda 5 leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 10.6m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,796/year for the Mazda CX-30 and $1,967/year for the Omoda 5. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-30.
Estimated annual total: $1,796 (Mazda CX-30) vs $1,967 (Omoda 5). The Mazda CX-30 saves you roughly $171 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Omoda 5). The Omoda 5 has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —7yr (Omoda 5).
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Omoda 5 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Omoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Omoda 5 takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda CX-30 will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Omoda 5 has a clear edge. The Omoda 5 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-30 and Omoda 5?
The Omoda 5 is the cheapest at $27,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-30 by $2,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mazda CX-30 uses the least fuel at 6.3L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Omoda 5 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Omoda 5 has the largest boot at 358L.
Which can tow the most?
The Omoda 5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Omoda 5 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-30 makes the most power at 114kW. The Omoda 5 is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
