CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery C5 vs Omoda 5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery C5 vs Omoda 5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryOmoda
Price (RRP)$27,500$27,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power108kW108kW
0-100 km/h8.5s10.5s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Boot Space370L358L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Chery C5 & Omoda 5

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Chery C5 starts from $27,500 before on-road costs, while the Omoda 5 opens at $27,990. That makes the Chery C5 the more affordable entry point by $490.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $30,250 and $30,789 respectively.

Safety Rundown

Both the Chery C5 and Omoda 5 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 87% for the Chery C5 and 82% for the Omoda 5.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Omoda 5 packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Chery C5.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Chery C5 and 7 in the Omoda 5.

Feature Showdown

The Chery C5 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Omoda 5 gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Chery C5 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed dual clutch to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The Omoda 5 responds with a Petrol making 108kW and 210Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.

Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the real-world sprint, the Chery C5 is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery C5 measures 4,351mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 44mm longer than the Omoda 5 at 4,307mm (2,610mm wheelbase).

Boot space is 370L in the Chery C5 and 358L in the Omoda 5, giving the Chery C5 a 12L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.2m

TightestOmoda 5 FXTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Omoda 5 FX
10.6mTighter
Best
Chery C5 Urban
11.2m
Worst
Chery C5 Urban
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Omoda 5 FX
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestOmoda 5Tightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Chery C511.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Omoda 5Tightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Chery C5 and $1,967/year for the Omoda 5.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Chery C5) vs $1,967 (Omoda 5). Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery C5) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Omoda 5). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —7yr (Omoda 5).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery C5 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Omoda 5 if: You or prefer Omoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery C5 takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery C5 and Omoda 5?

The Chery C5 is the cheapest at $27,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Omoda 5 by $490.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery C5 uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery C5 and Omoda 5 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery C5 has the largest boot at 370L.

Which can tow the most?

The Omoda 5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs