CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 4 Hybrid vs Omoda 5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid vs Omoda 5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryOmoda
Price (RRP)$27,500$27,990
Fuel typeHybridPetrol
Power150kW108kW
0-100 km/h10.5s10.5s
Fuel Economy5.4 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Boot Space470L358L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid & Omoda 5

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid starts from $27,500 before on-road costs, while the Omoda 5 opens at $27,990. That makes the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid the more affordable entry point by $490.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $30,250 and $30,789 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid by roughly $2,140 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Omoda 5 gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid gets cloth upholstery while the Omoda 5 offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 1-zone in the Omoda 5.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses a Petrol I4 + HEV producing 150kW and 310Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Omoda 5 responds with a Petrol making 108kW and 210Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 108kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid measures 4,330mm long on a 2,604mm wheelbase, 23mm longer than the Omoda 5 at 4,307mm (2,610mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Omoda 5 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 470L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 358L in the Omoda 5, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid a 112L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 10.6m

TightestChery Tiggo 4 Hybrid UrbanTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid Urban
10.6mTighter
Best
Omoda 5 FX
10.6m
Best
Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid Urban
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Omoda 5 FX
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestChery Tiggo 4 HybridTightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Chery Tiggo 4 HybridTightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Omoda 510.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,539/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and $1,967/year for the Omoda 5. That is a $428 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.

Estimated annual total: $1,539 (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs $1,967 (Omoda 5). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid saves you roughly $428 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Omoda 5). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —7yr (Omoda 5).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Omoda 5 if: You or prefer Omoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid will save you roughly $428 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Omoda 5?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is the cheapest at $27,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Omoda 5 by $490.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Omoda 5 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the largest boot at 470L.

Which can tow the most?

The Omoda 5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid makes the most power at 150kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best mid-size SUVs