Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid vs Mazda CX-3
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid starts from $27,500 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-3 opens at $27,800. That makes the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid the more affordable entry point by $300.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $30,250 and $30,580 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Mazda CX-3 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 99% for the Mazda CX-3.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Mazda CX-3.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 6 in the Mazda CX-3.
Feature Showdown
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-3 gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Drivetrain
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses a Petrol I4 + HEV producing 71kW and 120Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Mazda CX-3 responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 195Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.
The Mazda CX-3 has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 71kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid measures 4,330mm long on a 2,604mm wheelbase, 55mm longer than the Mazda CX-3 at 4,275mm (2,570mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 358L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 350L in the Mazda CX-3, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid a 8L advantage.
For towing, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 10.6m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,539/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-3. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.
Estimated annual total: $1,539 (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs $1,710 (Mazda CX-3). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid saves you roughly $171 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-3). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-3 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid takes 6 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Mazda CX-3?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is the cheapest at $27,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-3 by $300.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Mazda CX-3 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the largest boot at 358L.
Which can tow the most?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-3 makes the most power at 110kW. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
