Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid vs Suzuki Fronx
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 31 Aug 2026, price 27 Oct 2026
Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$27,500est. RRP
- no option data for this car
$27,250est. RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid & Suzuki Fronx
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid starts from $27,500 (our estimated RRP; the brand lists drive-away prices only) before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Fronx opens at $27,250 (our estimated RRP; the brand lists drive-away prices only). That makes the Suzuki Fronx the more affordable entry point by $250.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $29,990 for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and $29,990 for the Suzuki Fronx.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid
- REC-006735 · published 28 Sep 2026Due to a software issue, the Evaporative Emission Control (EVAP) system valve may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2025 - 2026
Suzuki Fronx
- REC-006521 · published 23 Dec 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the left rear seat belt retractor mechanism may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2025
- REC-006520 · published 23 Dec 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the left rear seat belt retractor mechanism may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2025
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Fronx gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Suzuki Fronx. The Suzuki Fronx counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid gets cloth upholstery while the Suzuki Fronx offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 1-zone in the Suzuki Fronx.
Drivetrain
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses a Petrol I4 + HEV producing 150kW and 310Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Suzuki Fronx responds with a Petrol making 75.8kW and 137Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 75.8kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid measures 4,330mm long on a 2,604mm wheelbase, 335mm longer than the Suzuki Fronx at 3,995mm (2,520mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 470L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 304L in the Suzuki Fronx, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid a 166L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 10.6m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,539/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and $1,397/year for the Suzuki Fronx. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Fronx.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid: Top CarSorted Score, 73 vs 67, but the Suzuki Fronx is $250 cheaper
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (73 vs 67), taking 4 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: performance (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid ahead by 12), safety (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid ahead by 9), value (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid ahead by 9). The Suzuki Fronx will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Suzuki Fronx?
The Suzuki Fronx is the cheapest at $27,250 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid by $250.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Fronx uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Suzuki Fronx holds a 1-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the largest boot at 470L with the seats up.
Which has the best warranty?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid makes the most power at 150kW. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
