Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid vs Suzuki Fronx
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid starts from $27,500 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Fronx opens at $28,490. That makes the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid the more affordable entry point by $990.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $30,250 and $31,339 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Suzuki Fronx hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 48% for the Suzuki Fronx.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 6 in the Suzuki Fronx.
Feature Showdown
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Fronx gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid gets cloth upholstery while the Suzuki Fronx offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 1-zone in the Suzuki Fronx.
Drivetrain
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses a Petrol I4 + HEV producing 71kW and 120Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Suzuki Fronx responds with a Petrol making 74kW and 147Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.
The Suzuki Fronx has the clear power advantage at 74kW vs 71kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid measures 4,330mm long on a 2,604mm wheelbase, 335mm longer than the Suzuki Fronx at 3,995mm (2,520mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 358L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 308L in the Suzuki Fronx, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid a 50L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 10.6m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,539/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and $1,682/year for the Suzuki Fronx. That is a $143 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.
Estimated annual total: $1,539 (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs $1,682 (Suzuki Fronx). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid saves you roughly $143 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid takes 6 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid will save you roughly $143 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Suzuki Fronx?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is the cheapest at $27,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Fronx by $990.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Suzuki Fronx all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the largest boot at 358L.
Which can tow the most?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Suzuki Fronx makes the most power at 74kW. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
