Chery Tiggo 7 vs Suzuki Fronx
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Chery Tiggo 7
From $27,500
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
108kW
6.9 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
—
Suzuki Fronx
From $28,490
SUV
Hybrid
Petrol
75.8kW
4.9 L/100km
1★ ANCAP
304L
Track the Chery Tiggo 7 & Suzuki Fronx
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Chery Tiggo 7 starts from $27,500 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Fronx opens at $28,490. That makes the Chery Tiggo 7 the more affordable entry point by $990.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $30,250 and $31,339 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Fronx by roughly $2,850 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
The Chery Tiggo 7 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 1 stars for the Suzuki Fronx. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Chery Tiggo 7 and 48% for the Suzuki Fronx.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Chery Tiggo 7 and 6 in the Suzuki Fronx.
Feature Showdown
The Chery Tiggo 7 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Fronx gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 7 gets cloth upholstery while the Suzuki Fronx offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 7 and 1-zone in the Suzuki Fronx.
Drivetrain
The Chery Tiggo 7 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed dct to a FWD layout.
The Suzuki Fronx responds with a Petrol making 75.8kW and 137Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.
The Chery Tiggo 7 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 75.8kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Tiggo 7 measures 4,540mm long on a 2,661mm wheelbase, 545mm longer than the Suzuki Fronx at 3,995mm (2,520mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 7 generally means more rear legroom.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m diameter
Good
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Good
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 9.3 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.8 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Chery Tiggo 7 and $1,397/year for the Suzuki Fronx. That is a $570 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Fronx.
Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Chery Tiggo 7) vs $1,397 (Suzuki Fronx). The Suzuki Fronx saves you roughly $570 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 7) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx). The Chery Tiggo 7 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Tiggo 7 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery Tiggo 7 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki Fronx will save you roughly $570 a year in fuel. The Chery Tiggo 7 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 7 and Suzuki Fronx?
The Chery Tiggo 7 is the cheapest at $27,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Fronx by $990.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Fronx uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The Chery Tiggo 7 has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the best warranty?
The Chery Tiggo 7 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Tiggo 7 makes the most power at 108kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
