Chery Tiggo 7 vs Mazda CX-30
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Chery Tiggo 7 starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-30 opens at $29,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $32,989 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-30 by roughly $1,285 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Chery Tiggo 7 and Mazda CX-30 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Chery Tiggo 7 packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Mazda CX-30.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Chery Tiggo 7 and 6 in the Mazda CX-30.
Feature Showdown
The Chery Tiggo 7 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-30 gets a 8.8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Drivetrain
The Chery Tiggo 7 lines up producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.5 seconds.
The Mazda CX-30 lines up making 114kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.
The Mazda CX-30 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 108kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 7 is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Tiggo 7 measures 4,540mm long on a 2,661mm wheelbase, 145mm longer than the Mazda CX-30 at 4,395mm (2,655mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 7 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 475L in the Chery Tiggo 7 and 350L in the Mazda CX-30, giving the Chery Tiggo 7 a 125L advantage.
For towing, the Chery Tiggo 7 leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Chery Tiggo 7 and $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-30. That is a $257 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-30.
Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Chery Tiggo 7) vs $1,710 (Mazda CX-30). The Mazda CX-30 saves you roughly $257 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years (Chery Tiggo 7) vs 5 years (Mazda CX-30). The Chery Tiggo 7 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Tiggo 7 if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery Tiggo 7 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Mazda CX-30 will save you roughly $257 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 7 has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 7 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (18 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 18 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!

