CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 7 vs Skoda Kamiq
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 7 vs Skoda Kamiq

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Chery Tiggo 7: we're still completing 0-100km/h, ground clearance, turning circle and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecCherySkoda
Price (RRP)$27,500$30,900
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power108kW85kW
0-100 km/h10.1s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km5.5 L/100km
Boot Space400L
Towing1,200kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Chery Tiggo 7 & Skoda Kamiq

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 7 starts from $27,500 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Kamiq opens at $30,900. That makes the Chery Tiggo 7 the more affordable entry point by $3,400.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $29,990 for the Chery Tiggo 7 and $33,990 for the Skoda Kamiq.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Kamiq by roughly $1,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 7 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Kamiq gets a 8.3-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 7 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Skoda Kamiq. The Skoda Kamiq counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 7 uses a 1.5L Turbo Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a 6 speed dual clutch transmission to a Front Wheel Drive (2WD) layout.

The Skoda Kamiq responds with a Petrol making 85kW and 200Nm, paired to a 7-speed dsg driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.1 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 7 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 85kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 7 measures 4,540mm long on a 2,661mm wheelbase, 299mm longer than the Skoda Kamiq at 4,241mm (2,651mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 7 generally means more rear legroom.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m diameter

Good

Skoda Kamiq 85TSI Select
10.8m
Skoda Kamiq 85TSI Select
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8 m Ø

Good

9.0 m road
Skoda Kamiq Turning circle · Ø 10.8 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.6 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Chery Tiggo 7 and $1,568/year for the Skoda Kamiq. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Kamiq.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Chery Tiggo 7) vs $1,568 (Skoda Kamiq). The Skoda Kamiq saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 7) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kamiq). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 7 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Kamiq if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 7 takes 2 of 3 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Skoda Kamiq will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 7 and Skoda Kamiq?

The Chery Tiggo 7 is the cheapest at $27,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Kamiq by $3,400.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Kamiq uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 7 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Kamiq has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 7 makes the most power at 108kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs