Mazda CX-30 vs Skoda Kamiq
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-30 starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Kamiq opens at $29,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $32,989 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mazda CX-30 and Skoda Kamiq hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Skoda Kamiq packs more ADAS features with 4 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Mazda CX-30.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-30 lines up producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.
The Skoda Kamiq lines up making 85kW and 200Nm, paired to a 7-speed dsg driving the front wheels.
The Mazda CX-30 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 85kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
Boot space is 350L in the Mazda CX-30 and 400L in the Skoda Kamiq, giving the Skoda Kamiq a 50L advantage.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-30 and $1,625/year for the Skoda Kamiq. That is a $85 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Kamiq.
Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Mazda CX-30) vs $1,625 (Skoda Kamiq). The Skoda Kamiq saves you roughly $85 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years (Mazda CX-30) vs 7 years (Skoda Kamiq). The Skoda Kamiq has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Skoda Kamiq if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Skoda Kamiq takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Skoda Kamiq will save you roughly $85 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Kamiq has a clear edge. The Skoda Kamiq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (18 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 18 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!