Mazda CX-30 vs Skoda Kamiq
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Mazda CX-30
From $29,990
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
114kW
6.3 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
317L
Skoda Kamiq
From $30,900
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
85kW
5.5 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
400L
Track the Mazda CX-30 & Skoda Kamiq
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-30 starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Kamiq opens at $30,900. That makes the Mazda CX-30 the more affordable entry point by $910.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $33,990 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Kamiq by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-30 features a 8.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Kamiq gets a 8.3-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-30 uses a Petrol producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.
The Skoda Kamiq responds with a Petrol making 85kW and 200Nm, paired to a 7-speed dsg driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.1 seconds.
The Mazda CX-30 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 85kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Kamiq is 0.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-30 measures 4,395mm long on a 2,655mm wheelbase, 154mm longer than the Skoda Kamiq at 4,241mm (2,651mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-30 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 317L in the Mazda CX-30 and 400L in the Skoda Kamiq, giving the Skoda Kamiq a 83L advantage.
For towing, the Skoda Kamiq leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 10.8m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,796/year for the Mazda CX-30 and $1,568/year for the Skoda Kamiq. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Kamiq.
Estimated annual total: $1,796 (Mazda CX-30) vs $1,568 (Skoda Kamiq). The Skoda Kamiq saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kamiq). The Skoda Kamiq has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Skoda Kamiq if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Skoda Kamiq takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Skoda Kamiq will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Kamiq has a clear edge. The Skoda Kamiq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-30 and Skoda Kamiq?
The Mazda CX-30 is the cheapest at $29,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Kamiq by $910.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Skoda Kamiq uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of Mazda CX-30 and Skoda Kamiq carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.
Which has the most boot space?
The Skoda Kamiq has the largest boot at 400L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-30 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Skoda Kamiq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-30 makes the most power at 114kW. The Skoda Kamiq is quickest to 100km/h in 10.1s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
