CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid vs Skoda Kamiq
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid vs Skoda Kamiq

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 31 Aug 2026, price 23 Sep 2026

Winner
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid
Chery

Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid

16 of 27 standard · no option data · 11 no data

From

$32,300

est. RRP, before on-road costs

Body
SUV
Fuel type
Plug-in Hybrid
Engine
Petrol I4 Turbo + PHEV
Power
180kW
Economy
1.4 kWh/100km
Safety
5★ ANCAP
Boot (seats up)
475L
78CarSorted Score / 100

Top CarSorted Score, 78 vs 73, but the Skoda Kamiq is $1,400 cheaper

Skoda Kamiq
Skoda

Skoda Kamiq

11 of 27 standard · no option data · 16 no data

From

$30,900

est. RRP, before on-road costs

Body
SUV
Fuel type
Petrol
Engine
Petrol
Power
85kW
Economy
5.5 L/100km
Safety
No data
Boot (seats up)
400L
73CarSorted Score / 100

Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Chery Tiggo 7 Super HybridUrban10?02
Skoda Kamiq85TSI Select7?05

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecCherySkoda
Price (RRP)$32,300 est.$30,900 est.
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$32,300est. RRP

  • with the Skoda Kamiq's standard kit: $32,300 (nothing to add)

$30,900est. RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePlug-in HybridPetrol
Range (WLTP)93km—
Battery18.3 kWh—
Electric range93km—
Power180kW85kW
0-100 km/h9.5s10.1s
Max DC Charge40kW—
Fuel Economy1.4 kWh/100km5.5 L/100km
Boot (seats up)475L400L
Towing—1,200kg
Warranty7yr / No data7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid & Skoda Kamiq

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid starts from $32,300 (our estimated RRP; the brand lists drive-away prices only) before on-road costs, while the Skoda Kamiq opens at $30,900 (our estimated RRP; the brand lists drive-away prices only). That makes the Skoda Kamiq the more affordable entry point by $1,400.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $34,990 for the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid and $33,990 for the Skoda Kamiq.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid by roughly $7,505 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid

None open on our record

Skoda Kamiq

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

18.3kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

22 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 40kW · 0–80%

27 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (6.6kW AC, 40kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Kamiq gets a 8.3-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Skoda Kamiq. The Skoda Kamiq counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Skoda Kamiq offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid uses a Petrol I4 Turbo + PHEV producing 180kW and 310Nm of torque, sent through a 1-speed dedicated hybrid transmission (dht) to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.5 seconds.

The Skoda Kamiq responds with a Petrol making 85kW and 200Nm, paired to a 7-speed dsg driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.1 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 85kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid measures 4,535mm long on a 2,653mm wheelbase, 294mm longer than the Skoda Kamiq at 4,241mm (2,651mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 475L in the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid and 400L in the Skoda Kamiq, giving the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid a 75L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.2m

TightestSkoda Kamiq 85TSI SelectTightest turn at 10.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Skoda Kamiq 85TSI Select
10.8mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid Urban
11.2m
Worst
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid Urban
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Kamiq 85TSI Select
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSkoda KamiqTightest turn at 10.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Skoda KamiqTightest10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $67/year for the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid and $1,568/year for the Skoda Kamiq. That is a $1,501 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid.

Warranty: 7 years (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kamiq). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Kamiq if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid: Top CarSorted Score, 78 vs 73, but the Skoda Kamiq is $1,400 cheaper

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (78 vs 73), taking 3 of 5 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid ahead by 27), fuel economy (Skoda Kamiq ahead by 8), value (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid ahead by 7). The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid will save you roughly $1,501 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid and Skoda Kamiq?

The Skoda Kamiq is the cheapest at $30,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid by $1,400.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid uses the least fuel at 1.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Skoda Kamiq, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid has the largest boot at 475L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Kamiq has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid makes the most power at 180kW. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid is quickest to 100km/h in 9.5s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs