CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKia Seltos vs Skoda Kamiq
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Kia Seltos vs Skoda Kamiq

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKiaSkoda
Price (RRP)$31,250$30,900
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power110kW85kW
0-100 km/h9.2s10.1s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km5.5 L/100km
Boot Space468L400L
Towing1,100kg1,200kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Kia Seltos & Skoda Kamiq

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Kia Seltos starts from $31,250 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Kamiq opens at $30,900. That makes the Skoda Kamiq the more affordable entry point by $350.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $34,375 and $33,990 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Kamiq by roughly $1,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Kia Seltos features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Skoda Kamiq gets a 8.3-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Kia Seltos stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Skoda Kamiq. The Skoda Kamiq counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Kia Seltos uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 180Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.2 seconds.

The Skoda Kamiq responds with a Petrol making 85kW and 200Nm, paired to a 7-speed dsg driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.1 seconds.

The Kia Seltos has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 85kW. In the real-world sprint, the Kia Seltos is 0.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Kia Seltos measures 4,385mm long on a 2,630mm wheelbase, 144mm longer than the Skoda Kamiq at 4,241mm (2,651mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Kamiq generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 468L in the Kia Seltos and 400L in the Skoda Kamiq, giving the Kia Seltos a 68L advantage.

For towing, the Skoda Kamiq leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 1,100kg. That 100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 10.8m

TightestKia Seltos STightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Kia Seltos S
10.6mTighter
Best
Skoda Kamiq 85TSI Select
10.8m
Worst
Kia Seltos S
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Kamiq 85TSI Select
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKia SeltosTightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Kia SeltosTightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Skoda Kamiq10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Kia Seltos and $1,568/year for the Skoda Kamiq. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Kamiq.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Kia Seltos) vs $1,568 (Skoda Kamiq). The Skoda Kamiq saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Seltos) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kamiq). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Kia Seltos if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Kamiq if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Kia Seltos and Skoda Kamiq trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Skoda Kamiq will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Kia Seltos has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Kia Seltos and Skoda Kamiq?

The Skoda Kamiq is the cheapest at $30,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Kia Seltos by $350.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Kamiq uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Kia Seltos all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia Seltos has the largest boot at 468L.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Kamiq has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Kia Seltos makes the most power at 110kW. The Kia Seltos is quickest to 100km/h in 9.2s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs