Skoda Kamiq vs Suzuki Fronx
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 30 Aug 2026, price 14 Oct 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$30,900est. RRP
- no option data for this car
$27,250est. RRP
- with the Skoda Kamiq's standard kit: $27,250 (nothing to add)
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Skoda Kamiq & Suzuki Fronx
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Skoda Kamiq starts from $30,900 (our estimated RRP; the brand lists drive-away prices only) before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Fronx opens at $27,250 (our estimated RRP; the brand lists drive-away prices only). That makes the Suzuki Fronx the more affordable entry point by $3,650.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $33,990 for the Skoda Kamiq and $29,990 for the Suzuki Fronx.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
Skoda Kamiq
None open on our record
Suzuki Fronx
- REC-006521 · published 23 Dec 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the left rear seat belt retractor mechanism may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2025
- REC-006520 · published 23 Dec 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the left rear seat belt retractor mechanism may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2025
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Skoda Kamiq features a 8.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Fronx gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Skoda Kamiq stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Suzuki Fronx. The Suzuki Fronx counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Skoda Kamiq gets cloth upholstery while the Suzuki Fronx offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Skoda Kamiq and 1-zone in the Suzuki Fronx.
Drivetrain
The Skoda Kamiq uses a Petrol producing 85kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dsg to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.1 seconds.
The Suzuki Fronx responds with a Petrol making 75.8kW and 137Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.
The Skoda Kamiq has the clear power advantage at 85kW vs 75.8kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Skoda Kamiq is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Skoda Kamiq measures 4,241mm long on a 2,651mm wheelbase, 246mm longer than the Suzuki Fronx at 3,995mm (2,520mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Kamiq generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 400L in the Skoda Kamiq and 304L in the Suzuki Fronx, giving the Skoda Kamiq a 96L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1395L vs 605L.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 10.8m
Based on 10.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,568/year for the Skoda Kamiq and $1,397/year for the Suzuki Fronx. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Fronx.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kamiq) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx). The Skoda Kamiq has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Skoda Kamiq if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Skoda Kamiq: Top CarSorted Score, 73 vs 67, but the Suzuki Fronx is $3,650 cheaper
The Skoda Kamiq comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (73 vs 67), taking 5 of 7 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: practicality (Skoda Kamiq ahead by 13), performance (Skoda Kamiq ahead by 11), reliability (Skoda Kamiq ahead by 10). The Suzuki Fronx will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Kamiq has a clear edge. The Skoda Kamiq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Skoda Kamiq and Suzuki Fronx?
The Suzuki Fronx is the cheapest at $27,250 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Kamiq by $3,650.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Fronx uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Suzuki Fronx holds a 1-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Skoda Kamiq, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Skoda Kamiq has the largest boot at 400L with the seats up (1,395L with the seats folded).
Which can tow the most?
The Skoda Kamiq has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Skoda Kamiq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Skoda Kamiq makes the most power at 85kW. The Skoda Kamiq is quickest to 100km/h in 10.1s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
