Skoda Kamiq vs Suzuki Fronx
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Skoda Kamiq starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Fronx opens at $28,490. That makes the Suzuki Fronx the more affordable entry point by $1,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $31,339 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Skoda Kamiq and Suzuki Fronx hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 96% for the Skoda Kamiq and 48% for the Suzuki Fronx.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Suzuki Fronx packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Skoda Kamiq.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.
Feature Showdown
The Skoda Kamiq features a 8.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Fronx gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Interior trim differs: the Skoda Kamiq gets cloth upholstery while the Suzuki Fronx offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Skoda Kamiq and 1-zone in the Suzuki Fronx.
Drivetrain
The Skoda Kamiq uses a Petrol producing 85kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dsg to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Suzuki Fronx responds with a Petrol making 74kW and 147Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.
The Skoda Kamiq has the clear power advantage at 85kW vs 74kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Kamiq is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Skoda Kamiq measures 4,241mm long on a 2,651mm wheelbase, 246mm longer than the Suzuki Fronx at 3,995mm (2,520mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Kamiq generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 400L in the Skoda Kamiq and 308L in the Suzuki Fronx, giving the Skoda Kamiq a 92L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 10.8m
Based on 10.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,625/year for the Skoda Kamiq and $1,682/year for the Suzuki Fronx. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Kamiq.
Estimated annual total: $1,625 (Skoda Kamiq) vs $1,682 (Suzuki Fronx). The Skoda Kamiq saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kamiq) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx). The Skoda Kamiq has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Skoda Kamiq if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Skoda Kamiq takes 5 of 6 key spec categories. The Skoda Kamiq will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Kamiq has a clear edge. The Skoda Kamiq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Skoda Kamiq and Suzuki Fronx?
The Suzuki Fronx is the cheapest at $28,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Kamiq by $1,500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Skoda Kamiq uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Skoda Kamiq and Suzuki Fronx all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Skoda Kamiq has the largest boot at 400L.
Which has the best warranty?
The Skoda Kamiq has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Skoda Kamiq makes the most power at 85kW. The Skoda Kamiq is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
