Chery Tiggo 4 vs Suzuki Fronx
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Chery Tiggo 4 starts from $23,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Fronx opens at $28,490. That makes the Chery Tiggo 4 the more affordable entry point by $4,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $26,389 and $31,339 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Fronx by roughly $2,135 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Chery Tiggo 4 and Suzuki Fronx hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Chery Tiggo 4 and 48% for the Suzuki Fronx.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4 and 6 in the Suzuki Fronx.
Feature Showdown
The Chery Tiggo 4 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Suzuki Fronx gets a 7-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Drivetrain
The Chery Tiggo 4 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Suzuki Fronx responds with a Petrol making 74kW and 147Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.
The Chery Tiggo 4 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 74kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 4 is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Tiggo 4 measures 4,307mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 312mm longer than the Suzuki Fronx at 3,995mm (2,520mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 4 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 358L in the Chery Tiggo 4 and 308L in the Suzuki Fronx, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 a 50L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 10.6m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 and $1,682/year for the Suzuki Fronx. That is a $427 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Fronx.
Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Chery Tiggo 4) vs $1,682 (Suzuki Fronx). The Suzuki Fronx saves you roughly $427 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx). The Chery Tiggo 4 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery Tiggo 4 takes 6 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki Fronx will save you roughly $427 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 4 has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 4 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 4 and Suzuki Fronx?
The Chery Tiggo 4 is the cheapest at $23,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Fronx by $4,500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Fronx uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 4 and Suzuki Fronx all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Chery Tiggo 4 has the largest boot at 358L.
Which can tow the most?
The Chery Tiggo 4 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Chery Tiggo 4 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Tiggo 4 makes the most power at 108kW. The Chery Tiggo 4 is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
