CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 4 vs Suzuki Ignis
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 4 vs Suzuki Ignis

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCherySuzuki
Price (RRP)$23,990$22,490
Power108kW61kW
0-100 km/h10.5s12.8s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km4.9 L/100km
Boot Space358L260L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 starts from $23,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Ignis opens at $22,490. That makes the Suzuki Ignis the more affordable entry point by $1,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $26,389 and $24,739 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Ignis by roughly $3,560 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Chery Tiggo 4 and Suzuki Ignis hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Chery Tiggo 4 packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Suzuki Ignis.

Both include the essentials: lane keep assist, a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 4 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Suzuki Ignis responds with a Petrol making 61kW and 113Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.8 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 4 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 61kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 4 is 2.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 4 measures 4,307mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 607mm longer than the Suzuki Ignis at 3,700mm (2,435mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 4 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 358L in the Chery Tiggo 4 and 260L in the Suzuki Ignis, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 a 98L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m diameter

Good

Chery Tiggo 4 Urban
10.6m
Chery Tiggo 4
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 and $1,397/year for the Suzuki Ignis. That is a $712 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Ignis.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Chery Tiggo 4) vs $1,397 (Suzuki Ignis). The Suzuki Ignis saves you roughly $712 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Ignis). The Chery Tiggo 4 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Ignis if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 4 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Suzuki Ignis will save you roughly $712 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 4 has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 4 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs