CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGAC Emzoom vs Suzuki Ignis
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GAC Emzoom vs Suzuki Ignis

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGACSuzuki
Price (RRP)$25,590$22,490
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power125kW66kW
0-100 km/h7.8s12.8s
Fuel Economy6.6 L/100km4.9 L/100km
Boot Space341L271L
Warranty7yr / 150k km3yr / 100k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the GAC Emzoom & Suzuki Ignis

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The GAC Emzoom starts from $25,590 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Ignis opens at $22,490. That makes the Suzuki Ignis the more affordable entry point by $3,100.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $28,149 and $24,739 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Ignis by roughly $2,420 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The GAC Emzoom features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Ignis gets a 7-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GAC Emzoom stands out with wireless charging, panoramic roof, power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Suzuki Ignis. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the GAC Emzoom gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Suzuki Ignis offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the GAC Emzoom and 1-zone in the Suzuki Ignis.

Drivetrain

The GAC Emzoom uses a Petrol Turbo producing 125kW and 270Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.8 seconds.

The Suzuki Ignis responds with a Petrol making 66kW and 120Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.8 seconds.

The GAC Emzoom has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 66kW. In the real-world sprint, the GAC Emzoom is 5.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GAC Emzoom measures 4,410mm long on a 2,650mm wheelbase, 710mm longer than the Suzuki Ignis at 3,700mm (2,435mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GAC Emzoom generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 341L in the GAC Emzoom and 271L in the Suzuki Ignis, giving the GAC Emzoom a 70L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.4m to 11.2m

TightestSuzuki Ignis GL AutoTightest turn at 9.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Ignis GL Auto
9.4mTighter
Best
GAC Emzoom Luxury
11.2m
Worst
GAC Emzoom Luxury
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Ignis GL Auto
9.4m · Excellent

Based on 9.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki IgnisTightest turn at 9.4m, needs the least road to swing around
GAC Emzoom11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Suzuki IgnisTightest9.4 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,881/year for the GAC Emzoom and $1,397/year for the Suzuki Ignis. That is a $484 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Ignis.

Estimated annual total: $1,881 (GAC Emzoom) vs $1,397 (Suzuki Ignis). The Suzuki Ignis saves you roughly $484 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 150,000km (GAC Emzoom) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Ignis). The GAC Emzoom has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GAC Emzoom if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Ignis if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GAC Emzoom takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Suzuki Ignis will save you roughly $484 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GAC Emzoom has a clear edge. The GAC Emzoom adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GAC Emzoom and Suzuki Ignis?

The Suzuki Ignis is the cheapest at $22,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GAC Emzoom by $3,100.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Ignis uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of GAC Emzoom and Suzuki Ignis carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The GAC Emzoom has the largest boot at 341L.

Which has the best warranty?

The GAC Emzoom has the longest warranty at 7 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The GAC Emzoom makes the most power at 125kW. The GAC Emzoom is quickest to 100km/h in 7.8s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs